How Does Adding NO2 Affect N2 Concentration in Equilibrium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter terryds
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the effect of adding 2 moles of NO2 gas to a closed system at equilibrium for the reaction N2 + O2 ↔ 2NO. Initially, the equilibrium concentration of N2, O2, and NO is 0.8 M, leading to a calculated Kc of 1. When NO2 is added, the new equilibrium concentration of N2 was determined using an ICE table, resulting in a final concentration of 1.13 M. There was confusion regarding the concentration of NO, but the correct approach clarified that the ICE table method is reliable for tracking stoichiometry. Ultimately, the accurate concentration of N2 after the addition of NO2 is confirmed to be 1.13 M.
terryds
Messages
392
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


At certain pressure and temperature in a 2 L closed flask, equilibrium reaction undergoes such as :

N2 (g) + O2 (g) ↔ 2NO (g)

Each concentration of the substances in equilibrium is 0.8 M.
If we add 2 mole of NO2 gas into the flask, then the concentration of N2 gas in the new equilibrium is ...

A. 1.13 M
B. 1.80 M
C. 2.20 M
D. 2.60 M
E. 2.80 M

Homework Equations


[/B]
Kc = products of right molarity / products of left molarity

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
At initial equilibrium
Kc = (0.8)^2 / (0.8)(0.8) = 1

Change in mole = 2 mole => Change in molarity = 2 mole / 2 liter = 2 M

At final equilibrium
Kc = (1.8)^2 / (x^2)
1 = (1.8)^2 / (x^2)
x = 1.8 M

However, the answer key is A. 1.13 M :frown:
Please help what I missed
 
Physics news on Phys.org
terryds said:
If we add 2 mole of NO2 gas into the flask, then the concentration of N2 gas in the new equilibrium is ...
Do you mean NO?
 
terryds said:
Kc = (1.8)^2 / (x^2)

Nope, concentration of NO at equilibrium is not 1.8.

This is best done using an ICE table.
 
DrClaude said:
Do you mean NO?
NO2 is what written in the problem. Maybe, it's a typo from the problem-maker.

Borek said:
Nope, concentration of NO at equilibrium is not 1.8.

This is best done using an ICE table.

Okay, I'll try

2nqze3m.png


Kc = (1.8-2x)^2/(0.8+x)^2
1 = (1.8-2x)^2/(0.8+x)^2

Using calculator, x = 0.3333 M
N2 concentration = 0.8+0.33 = 1.13 M

Thanks for all your help! ICE table is really a reliable method! :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Borek
Remember ICE is just an easy and convenient way of keeping track of the stoichiometry, it doesn't add anything new to the way we solve equilibrium problems.
 
  • Like
Likes terryds
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top