How does alternating current transfer energy?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around how alternating current (AC) transfers energy through a wire, exploring the movement of electrons, the role of voltage sources, and the mechanics of energy transfer in AC systems. Participants examine theoretical models, practical implications, and analogies to clarify the concept.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a simplified model of electron movement in AC, questioning the energy dynamics when electrons move back and forth.
  • Another participant asserts that electrons cannot move through a wire without a source and load, indicating a limitation in the original model.
  • A comparison is made between the energy transfer of AC and a saw, suggesting that energy is transferred in both directions.
  • It is noted that electrons have a slow drift velocity, and the energy transfer is more about the movement of electrons pushing each other rather than their individual motion.
  • One participant emphasizes that the energy required to build up the magnetic field in the wire is more significant than the energy of the moving electrons themselves.
  • A participant explains that AC current is produced from a potential difference, with the voltage source supplying energy to the electrons, which then move in alternating directions.
  • Another analogy involving an undershot water wheel is used to illustrate that energy is lost regardless of the direction of flow in both AC and DC circuits.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the mechanics of energy transfer in AC systems, with no consensus reached on the specifics of electron movement and energy dynamics.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight limitations in the original model, such as the need for a source and load, and the complexity of energy dynamics in AC circuits, which may not be fully captured in simplified explanations.

matroska
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The specific problem I'd like to know is let's say you have Mr electron (E) in a the wire, denoted by "---"

Lets assume 0.5hz AC for now. Below is a snapshot in time of the electron in the wire.

Code:
1s ------E-------
2s -----------E--
3s-------E-------
4s------------E--
5s-------E-------

Lets assume "-----" is the physical distance the electron (E) traverses along the wire for each half cycle.

I realize it's probably an over simplification but if that is the general gist of things, my question is, obviously energy was required to move the electron towards the right. That in turn probably pushes another electron to the right as well.

All good so far, but then when the electron comes "back", surely it needs to pull kinetic energy backwards down the wire?

Hence the assumption is the total energy transferred is zero. Conservation of momentum?

Obviously this is not correct, so wondering if someone can explain the flaw :p
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electrons cannot traverse a wire without a source and a load. Your model is incomplete.
 
A saw transfers energy in both the push and pull strokes too...
 
Something that i didnt figure out soon enough in my studies is that electrons have a drift velocity that is actually very slow (fractions of a mm per sec). Its only the energy of one moving electron that repels the one in front of it to move and so on. Just like at train. The mechanical energy used to rotated the conductor in the generator is then turning that energy into electrical in the form of moving electrons. So the energy is the moving electrons, doesn't matter which direction they are moving.
 
And the generator is constantly spinning so it is not using the same energy to "push" the electrons as it is to "pull" them.
 
lundyjb said:
Something that i didnt figure out soon enough in my studies is that electrons have a drift velocity that is actually very slow (fractions of a mm per sec). Its only the energy of one moving electron that repels the one in front of it to move and so on. Just like at train. The mechanical energy used to rotated the conductor in the generator is then turning that energy into electrical in the form of moving electrons. So the energy is the moving electrons, doesn't matter which direction they are moving.

The energy is not in the moving electrons, The mass and the speed of the electrons is so small, that the energy to get them moving is completely unimportant compared to the energy needed to build up the magnetic field because of the current in the wire.
 
skeptic2 said:
Electrons cannot traverse a wire without a source and a load. Your model is incomplete.

http://i.imm.io/DKrJ.jpeg

Still confused :/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP, you have to ask a clear and definite question or no one will be able to help.

Based on what you have said, here's my two cents-

AC current, or any current for that matter, is produced from a potential difference (voltage source). Now, the voltage source is the thing that is supplying energy and is where your "transfer of energy" takes place. The battery supplies a potential difference forcing the electrons to move in one way, and then the battery switches its polarity and cause the electrons to move the other way. In both situations the battery supplies energy to the electrons to traverse through the wire.

Now, I think you are asking how does AC current itself transfer energy outside of the system. The answer to this is that an AC current is usually put inside of a magnetic field, perpendicular to the field. We can imagine the circuit as being a loop of wire. The loop of wire then experiences a force due to the external magnetic field because of the moving electrons. This causes the entire loop to rotate inside. When the loop rotates so that it is parallel to the field, the currents direction must reverse in order for it to experience the force/torque in the same direction. This keeps the loop spinning in the same direction.
Check out this post that gives a good explanation of this phenomena - http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080512175617AAnwZeG
This spinning motion is what is used as energy, and is where the external transfer of energy may take place.
 
All good so far, but then when the electron comes "back", surely it needs to pull kinetic energy backwards down the wire?

Imagine you have an under shot water wheel.. It doesn't matter which way the water is flowing the wheel will still turn and grind corn. The water looses energy whichever direction it's going.

If you think about it in a DC circuit the electrons on one side of the load travel towards the load and on the other side they travel away from the load. In an AC circuit the direction alternates. In both directions there is a voltage drop across the load.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K