How does an object move up with the same force as weight?

In summary: Thus, if an object is at rest initially with a mass of 10 kg and we apply 100 N of force upward, it will start moving upward. Once it leaves the ground, the net force becomes zero and it will continue to move at a constant velocity upwards. The work done in moving the object 2m high is the 100N of force applied over a distance of 2m, which equals 200J. The force used in moving the object up is the initial 100N force applied upwards, which is canceled by the weight of the object. In order to start the object moving upwards, a net force must be applied to overcome the object's initial state of rest. Once the object is in motion, the net
  • #1
Miraj Kayastha
80
0
I really don't understand this concept:

If an object is at rest initially. The object has mass 10 kg. Then if we apply 100 N (g=10m/s/s) in upward direction. How does it move in a constant velocity?

Because the way I understand it, the object should be at motion initially to go in a constant velocity if net force is 0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If the object is at rest, the ground underneath it is already applying an upward force of 100N - otherwise the object would be falling towards the center of the Earth at 10 m/s/s.

So when you apply your 100N of force as well, that's plenty to start the object moving upwards. But as soon as it leaves the ground, the ground is no longer applying a force to the object, so we just have your 100N up and gravity's 100N down, for a net force of zero. Net force of zero means no acceleration, no change of speed... But we've already started the object moving up, so no change of speed means it keeps moving up.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
So, if the object was in my hand my hand would apply an upward force of 100N. Then what is the work done in moving the object 2m high. And what force is used in moving the object up and if the 100N is used isn't it canceled by weight already?
 
  • #4
Miraj Kayastha said:
So, if the object was in my hand my hand would apply an upward force of 100N. Then what is the work done in moving the object 2m high. And what force is used in moving the object up and if the 100N is used isn't it canceled by weight already?

If the object starts in your hand and at rest, you're applying 100N to just hold it there. You'll have to increase that force just the least little bit to start it moving, but once you've started it moving you can go back to 100N to exactly cancel out gravity and keep it moving at a constant speed.

The work done is the 100N you're applying, over a distance of 2m. You're doing that work no matter what gravity is doing; if there were no gravity you'd get a lot more acceleration and speed out of your 200J (100N times 2m) but it would still be 200J of work you did.
 
  • #5
Nugatory said:
If the object is at rest, the ground underneath it is already applying an upward force of 100N - otherwise the object would be falling towards the center of the Earth at 10 m/s/s.

So when you apply your 100N of force as well, that's plenty to start the object moving upwards. But as soon as it leaves the ground, the ground is no longer applying a force to the object, so we just have your 100N up and gravity's 100N down, for a net force of zero. Net force of zero means no acceleration, no change of speed... But we've already started the object moving up, so no change of speed means it keeps moving up.

If we start to apply a force increasing from 0 to 100N, the object will not move upwards. The application of the applied force decreases the normal force the Earth has on the object from 100N to 0N. The Gravity and the 100N apllied force still cancel out to zero.
Different words - same theme.
 
  • #6
I think the answer must hinge on the strict description of the experiment - how near the experiment is to the simple, ideal, theoretical model. You're always on potentially dodgy ground when you try to apply the simple theory to a practical case and then assume you can depart from the ideal without some paradoxical behaviour.
If the upward force is exactly the same as its weight, the object will neither move (accelerate) up or down. Any excess force upwards will result in a small but finite upwards acceleration (assuming a uniform gravitational field, of course).
 
  • #7
Miraj Kayastha said:
I really don't understand this concept:

If an object is at rest initially. The object has mass 10 kg. Then if we apply 100 N (g=10m/s/s) in upward direction. How does it move in a constant velocity?

Because the way I understand it, the object should be at motion initially to go in a constant velocity if net force is 0.
Newton'f first law:Every body tends to stay at rest or move at a constant velocity in a straight line,unless an external force acts on it.(or no net force is there)
When the object is at rest,there are no net forces.When it is moving at a constant velocity,there are no net forces,but the body should be moving before the net force becomes zero.



In case of gravity,If it is not moving,there is a 100N force applied upwards beforehand.
You have to make it move upwards by applying a net force directed upwards to start to move it upwards.Then if net force becomes zero(Upward force equals downward force),it will move with the speed it had just before net force becomes zero.
 

1. How does an object move up with the same force as its weight?

According to Newton's Second Law of Motion, an object will accelerate in the direction of the net force applied to it. In the case of an object moving up with the same force as its weight, the upward force (applied by a person or machine) is equal to the object's weight, so the net force is zero. However, the object's weight is still acting on it, causing it to move up due to the force of gravity.

2. What is the relationship between force and weight in this scenario?

In this scenario, the force and weight are equal and opposite, resulting in a net force of zero. This means that the object will not accelerate in either direction, but will remain in equilibrium.

3. Can an object move up with less force than its weight?

Yes, an object can move up with less force than its weight if there is an opposing force acting on it. For example, if a person is holding onto an object that weighs 10 pounds, they may only be applying 5 pounds of upward force to lift it. The other 5 pounds of force is provided by the person's arm muscles working against the force of gravity.

4. What factors can affect an object's ability to move up with the same force as its weight?

The main factor that can affect an object's ability to move up with the same force as its weight is the strength and direction of the force being applied. If the applied force is not equal to the object's weight, it will either accelerate or decelerate, depending on the direction of the force. Other factors that can affect this scenario include friction and air resistance.

5. Is it possible for an object to move up with a greater force than its weight?

Yes, it is possible for an object to move up with a greater force than its weight if there is an additional force acting on the object in the upward direction. This could be achieved by using a machine or tool, such as a pulley or lever, to provide an additional upward force. In this case, the net force would be greater than the object's weight, causing it to accelerate upwards.

Similar threads

  • Mechanics
Replies
2
Views
907
Replies
7
Views
745
  • Mechanics
6
Replies
202
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
894
Replies
4
Views
925
Replies
13
Views
737
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Mechanics
Replies
10
Views
998
Back
Top