How does an object undergo circular motion on a non-circular trajectory?

AI Thread Summary
An object can undergo circular motion even on a non-circular trajectory due to the concept of instantaneous centripetal acceleration, which is defined by the curvature of the path. When an object moves along a curved path, it can be approximated as moving along a circle at any given point, allowing for circular motion characteristics. If speed increases while maintaining a circular path, additional centripetal force is required to keep the object on track. The discussion highlights that while the trajectory may not be perfectly circular, the principles of circular motion still apply locally. Understanding these dynamics clarifies how objects can maintain circular motion under varying conditions.
medwatt
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
Hello,
Forgive me if this question is stupid.
How an object undergoes circular motion when the trajectory is not circular. I mean if it is not moving in a circle then why is it called circular motion.
http://emuonline.emu.edu.tr/phys101/PhIch6pg3_files/image009.gif

Let's suppose I am running along a circular path and I have a leaking cup of paint with me. Of course as long as speed is not changing, the paint will trace out a nice circular path.
But if I start increasing my speed, won't I go slightly of the circular track because I would have traveled just a tiny bit than was necessary ??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
medwatt said:
Hello,
Forgive me if this question is stupid.
How an object undergoes circular motion when the trajectory is not circular. I mean if it is not moving in a circle then why is it called circular motion.
http://emuonline.emu.edu.tr/phys101/PhIch6pg3_files/image009.gif
Here a circle is used to approximate an arbitrary path locally. Given the same tangential acceleration aT, the instantaneous centripetal acceleration aR at the point P of the path is the same as on the circle. The curvature of a path is defined via the radius of a circle.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curvature#Curvature_of_plane_curves
medwatt said:
Let's suppose I am running along a circular path and I have a leaking cup of paint with me. Of course as long as speed is not changing, the paint will trace out a nice circular path. But if I start increasing my speed, won't I go slightly of the circular track because I would have traveled just a tiny bit than was necessary ??
You can stay on a circular path and just increase your speed. You just need more centripetal force then.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top