How Does Angular Radius Relate to Deflection Angle in Redshift Calculations?

stuartgriffin
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A galaxy cluster of mass 3.0 × 1013M⊙ with known distance of 20 Mpc is observed in the centre of a bright ring, which is presumably a lensed galaxy. The angular radius of the ring from the cluster is 1.13 arcmin. The ring is observed to have a redshift of 0.0075. Assuming a value of 70kms−1Mpc−1 for the Hubble constant, determine whether the ring’s redshift distance is consistent at an accuracy of ~5% to the distance expected for the lensed galaxy to actually be located directly behind the cluster.
Relevant Equations
a=4GM/bc^2
V=H0D
I have attempted to link the equations, but I don't really understand how the data given fits. Does the angular radius get plugged in as the deflection angle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the distance to the lensed galaxy? How can this help you get the deflection angle?
 
  • Like
Likes stuartgriffin
Orodruin said:
What is the distance to the lensed galaxy? How can this help you get the deflection angle?

Ahhh, thank you, so I calculate the distance using the redshift and hubbles constant? Am I on the right lines with the equations I am using?
 
Orodruin said:
What is the distance to the lensed galaxy? How can this help you get the deflection angle?
Does this look like I'm headed on the right track?
 

Attachments

  • 16170999329211369232338957203962.jpg
    16170999329211369232338957203962.jpg
    48.4 KB · Views: 179
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top