How Does Building Height Affect Resonance During Earthquakes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bob4000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resonance
AI Thread Summary
The investigation focuses on the relationship between earthquake frequencies and building height, utilizing a model made of LEGO blocks to observe maximum deflection during vibrations at various frequencies. The researcher plotted graphs to illustrate the correlation between height, deflection, and frequency, seeking to connect these findings to relevant physics theories such as simple harmonic motion and resonance. Guidance is requested on how to analyze the graphs and apply theoretical concepts to the experimental data. Suggestions include writing harmonic analysis equations for the model and performing finite element analysis (FEA) to better understand building motion. The goal is to correlate experimental results with theoretical models effectively.
bob4000
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
i have undertaken an investigation, where the aim is to establish a relationship between the frequencies of an earthquake, and the height of the building(at maximum deflection parallel to motion). to do this, a model was created; a building of lego blocks and a vibration generator set to reciprocate at frequencies 2,4,6,8,10 Hz (all frequencies investigated separately). the height at which maximum deflection was acheived was takes as the resonant point. the building started at 2 blocks, increasing in increments of 2 blocks each time. the deflection and height was then plotted. graphs were plotted to illustrate height vs deflection and frequency vs max deflection.

now how would i relate this to relevant physics theories/laws. it MAY not seem difficult to yourself, but it has baffled both of my teachers. the ones that I know we have to discuss are simple harmonic motion and resonance. but we have trouble applying even these to this investigation. how would i deduce any information/analyse from such graphs as mentioned above.

I AM NOT ATTEMPTING TO GET SOMEONE TO DO THIS FOR ME, JUST POSITIVE IN DEPTH GUIDANCE.

Thank You for reading this.

PLEASE E-MAIL ME AT surjmann2907@hotmail.com FOR ANY PROOF OF WORK DONE
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems like the first step would be to write the harmonic analysis equations for a finite thickness rod, or maybe a finite thickness rectangular tower in the direction of the flat faces.

Then the next step toward understanding a building's motion would be to perform a finite element analysis using a computer. In the simplest version, you could just use Excel to construct a 10-floor building with known masses, spring constants, dampings, etc. In a more complicated analysis, you could use existing FEA software, or write your own code. In the end, you should be able to correlate the experimental results with your FEA results, as long as you have modeled the physical situation well in your code.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top