How Does Coriolis Force Influence Particle Motion in Rotating Systems?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of Lagrangian mechanics to analyze particle motion in a rotating system, specifically addressing the influence of the Coriolis force. Participants debate the appropriateness of using Lagrangian methods versus Newton's second law in a rotating frame, with suggestions to focus on the x-coordinate for simplification. There is uncertainty about deriving potential energy functions relevant to the forces acting on the particle. Ultimately, it is concluded that using Newton's approach may be more straightforward, as the Lagrangian method leads back to similar equations of motion. The conversation highlights the complexities of coordinate systems and the relevance of force components in rotating frames.
Bling Fizikst
Messages
119
Reaction score
16
Homework Statement
refer to image
Relevant Equations
refer to image
Source : JEE Advanced , Physics Sir JEE YT
Screenshot 2024-03-31 234456.png


Screenshot 2024-03-31 234636.png

I tried to attempt it using Lagrangian , so according to the coordinate axes given in the diagram , the position of the particle is let's say ##(0,d,-z)##
Let ##r## be the distance between the particle and the axis of rotation such that it subtends an angle of ##\theta## from the y axis .
So , ##-z=d\tan\theta\implies -\dot{z}=d\sec^2\theta \dot{\theta}##
$$\mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{2}m\dot{z}^2=\frac{1}{2}md^2\sec^4\theta \dot{\theta}^2$$
Now , writing the euler-lagrange equation and simplifying gives : $$\ddot{\theta}=-2\tan\theta \dot{\theta}^2$$
I am not sure how to deal with this .
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest that you use Newton's 2nd law in the frame of the rotating disk to derive the equation of motion for the particle. Setting up a Lagrangian would require introducing potential energy functions corresponding to the forces.

You are not choosing your x-y-z coordinate system as given in the problem. Note that it says "We assign x axis along the chord with origin at middle of the chord". The z axis is perpendicular to the disk. With this coordinate system, the y and z coordinates of the small block have trivial values. You only need to derive an equation of motion for the x coordinate.
 
Last edited:
TSny said:
I suggest that you use Newton's 2nd law in the frame of the rotating disk to derive the equation of motion for the particle. Setting up a Lagrangian would require introducing potential energy functions corresponding to the forces.

You are not choosing your x-y-z coordinate system as given in the problem. Note that it says "We assign x axis along the chord with origin at middle of the chord". The z axis is perpendicular to the disk. With this coordinate system, the y and z coordinates of the small block have trivial values. You only need to derive an equation of motion for the x coordinate.
Actually , i already saw the solution using frame of rotating disk , so , i wanted to try it out with lagrangian (if it makes stuff more straightforward) . Also , about the potential energies , can we find them ? for instance if we consider the x axis as the reference for gravitational potential energy then it's value will be zero . So , i am not sure how potential energy for the other forces will be generated . I have attached the figure , but i think it will lead to the same equation as above . Do you think it's worth trying with lagrangian though?
Screenshot 2024-04-01 022029.png
 
All motion takes place along the x-axis. Find an expression for the x-component of the net force acting on the particle as a function of ##x## (in the disk frame of reference): ##F^{net}_x (x)##.

Then, find a potential energy function ##V(x)## so that ##F^{net}_x (x) = -\dfrac {\partial V(x)}{\partial x}##. The Lagrangian will be ##L = T - V(x)##, where ##T## is the kinetic energy expressed as a function of ##\dot x##.

Of course, when you then set up the Euler-Lagrange equations, you will just get back ##m \ddot x = F^{net}_x (x)## which you could have written at the beginning. So, I don't see any advantage of the Lagrangian approach here.
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top