ajaysabarish
- 58
- 0
i have studied that a conductor is equipotential and charges don't flow through it but how does it flow through a wire?
ajaysabarish said:i have studied that a conductor is equipotential and charges don't flow through it but how does it flow through a wire?
I think you may be talking about a conductor in electrostatics.ajaysabarish said:and charges don't flow through it
but potential difference across a wire(conductor) is taken as zero while writing kirchhoffs law?so there is no potential difference hence charges shouldn't flow through itZapperZ said:It is because there is an external "source" that keeps one end of it at one potential, and the other end at another potential.
Note that the conductor does not have zero resistance for this to occur.
Zz
but potential difference across a wire(conductor) is taken as zero while writing kirchhoffs law?so there is no potential difference hence charges shouldn't flow through itPrannu said:Also note that if the conductor is in electrostatic equilibrium, then there is no (net) electric field on the charged particles inside (hence a constant electric potential). This means that if the conductor is not in electrostatic equilibrium, then there is a (net) electric field on the charged particles inside, and thus, a potential difference, which causes current.
iam talking about both,just comparing them.Dale said:I think you may be talking about a conductor in electrostatics.
ajaysabarish said:but potential difference across a wire(conductor) is taken as zero while writing kirchhoffs law?so there is no potential difference hence charges shouldn't flow through it
yes,so shouldn't it have a resistance,but why don't we take it during kirchhoffs lawZapperZ said:Try doing Kirchoff law on such a circuit, i.e. with a zero-resistance conductor connecting the ends of a battery. You will have a SHORT!
Zz.
ajaysabarish said:yes,so shouldn't it have a resistance,but why don't we take it during kirchhoffs law