How Does Electric Flux Differ Across a Hemispherical Surface?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mdf730
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux Hemisphere
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a Gaussian surface shaped as a hemisphere placed in a uniform electric field. The task is to determine the electric flux through both the flat base and the curved surface of the hemisphere, given that the surface encloses no net charge.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the electric field and the area of the surfaces involved, questioning whether the base area is simply a circle. There are attempts to apply Gauss's Law and evaluate the flux through the surfaces, with some participants suggesting the need for vector analysis.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the electric field and the nature of the Gaussian surface. Some participants have provided hints and guidance on evaluating the flux without fully solving the problem, while others are clarifying the assumptions regarding the net charge and the configuration of the surfaces.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential confusion regarding the net flux and the nature of the Gaussian surface, emphasizing that it does not enclose any charge, which raises questions about the expected flux values.

mdf730
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A Gaussian surface in the form of a hemisphere of radius R = 6.08 cm lies in a uniform electric field of magnitude E = 9.35 N/C. The surface encloses no net charge. At the (flat) base of the surface, the field is perpendicular to the surface and directed into the surface. What is the flux through (a) the base and (b) the curved portion of the surface?

Homework Equations



[itex]\Phi[/itex] = EA

The Attempt at a Solution



I assumed a would equal b, that is, both would be pi(.0608)^2 * 9.35, or .108 Nm^2/C.
That is indeed the correct answer for b, but a is still incorrect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So the e field is penetrating just a circular area pi*r^2. And half the surface area of a sphere 4*pi*r^2 divided by 2?

Have I read the question correctly that the base is just the area of a circle?
 
According to Gauß's Law, the total flux must be 0. To evaluate this explicitly for the given closed (!) surface, you have to use vectors:
[tex]\Phi=\int_A \mathrm{d} \vec{A} \cdot \vec{E}.[/tex]
Here, [itex]\mathrm{d} \vec{A}[/itex] is the surface-element vector, whose length is the area of that surface element and which points perpendicularly out of the volume enclosed by the surface (by convention).

To calculate it, parametrize the surface (for the spherical part, use spherical coordinates) and evaluate the corresponding usual double integral.
 
You don't need to evaluate any integrals.

Hint: the total flux leaving the closed hemisphere is what? What is the total flux entering from the bottom? Then, what is the total flux leaving the curved surface?
 
The Op indicates the answer says there is net flux. Yet it also says a Gaussian surface that does not enclose charge. So maybe the question involves two surfaces that are not closed and have e field penetrating them?
 
pgardn said:
The Op indicates the answer says there is net flux. Yet it also says a Gaussian surface that does not enclose charge. So maybe the question involves two surfaces that are not closed and have e field penetrating them?

No. There is just one hemispherical closed surface with the E field perpendicular to the flat side and directed into the surface (hint, hint). There is no net charge inside, therefore no net efflux or influx.

The OP is very close to the right answer for (a) also. I can't give more of a hint without flat-out divulging the answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
51
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
11K