How Does Isotope Mass Affect Sound Propagation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter astros10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isotopes Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on how isotope mass affects sound propagation, highlighting that the speed of sound is inversely proportional to the square root of a material's density. Heavier isotopes result in greater density, suggesting that sound would travel faster in lighter isotopes. However, the speed of sound also depends on the material's bulk modulus and Young's modulus, which remain relatively unchanged across isotopes due to electrostatic forces. The analogy of a mass-spring system is used to illustrate how changes in atomic mass influence vibrational transfer through a lattice of atoms. Ultimately, the consensus is that sound propagates faster in lighter isotopes due to their lower density.
astros10
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
If you have two isotopes, would the speed of sound through the atom be larger in the heavier isotope or the lighter isotope, or would they be equal, and why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isotopes have nearly the same atomic radii i.e. they take the same amount of space. But, their masses are different. So, basically a heavier isotope means a greater density.

For almost all states of matter, the speed of sound through a given material is inversely proportional to the square root of it's density.

So, the speed of sound must be higher in the lighter isotope.

But, it also depends on the 'Bulk modulus' or the 'Young's modulus' for that material. And since those parameters are governed by electrostatic forces and hence not really controlled by the nuetrons, i guess those values should more or less be same for all isotopes.
 
astros10 said:
If you have two isotopes, would the speed of sound through the atom be larger in the heavier isotope or the lighter isotope, or would they be equal, and why?

Since "speed of sound" depends on how well the atoms of the material vibrates, then you should think about an analogous situation. Look at a mass-spring system. What will change if you change the mass? Now imagine a lattice of all of these atoms all connected to each other with springs. If the mass of the atoms change, how will the vibration at one end transfers to the other?

Zz.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top