How Does Light Intensity Vary with Distance from an Incoherent Extended Source?

  • Thread starter Thread starter reasonableman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics Sources
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating light intensity from an incoherent extended source, likening it to an electrostatics problem. The user proposes modeling the source as a line of infinitesimal emitters, applying Lambertian emission principles and accounting for the 1/r² intensity drop-off and angle cosine effects. They express difficulty in integrating this model using Maxima, resulting in complex expressions. A suggestion is made to consider the far-field diffraction pattern for an aperture shaped like the incoherent source for a clearer understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lambertian emission principles
  • Familiarity with electrostatics concepts
  • Basic knowledge of optics and light intensity calculations
  • Experience with Maxima for mathematical modeling
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the far-field diffraction pattern in optics
  • Study the mathematical integration of light intensity from extended sources
  • Explore advanced optics textbooks covering incoherent sources
  • Learn about the application of Maxima in solving complex integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in optics, physicists studying light behavior, and anyone interested in advanced light intensity modeling from extended sources.

reasonableman
Messages
107
Reaction score
8
I'm currently trying to look into the optics of extended sources. Google doesn't seem too helpful.

Anyway, I have just been thinking about it and thought that surely one of the easiest problems would be the intensity at a screen at a particular distance from an incoherent, spatial extended source.

To me it looks pretty much like an electrostatics problem, common as an undergraduate.

I'm envisioning a line of infinitesimal sources, which will each contribute some light to a point. Which assuming a Lambertian emitter will be the intensity of that infinitesimal point but taking into account the 1/r^2 drop off and the cosine of the angle of the point.

I then integrate over the whole source. However when I put this into maxima (can't do it manually) I get some horrendously long expressions.

Am I doing something wrong with my model and can anyone suggest an introductory text for extended sources?
 
Science news on Phys.org
It is covered in many optics courses, but disguised. In fact, what you are asking is the far-field diffraction pattern for an aperture, when the field aperture is not a (coherent) plane wave but an incoherent field, and the aperture is shaped like your source. Try that approach and see what happens.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
9K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K