How does light travel through semi-opaque surfaces?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of light as it travels through semi-opaque surfaces, specifically comparing light dispersion through lenses versus non-lens surfaces. It concludes that the amount of light escaping through both surfaces remains proportional to the thickness of the grime covering them, regardless of the surface area. The inverse square law is also noted, indicating that light intensity diminishes with distance, but does not affect the comparative brightness of the two scenarios presented. Ultimately, both setups will allow the same fraction of light to escape, assuming equal light sources and grime thickness.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of light behavior and optics
  • Familiarity with the inverse square law of light
  • Basic knowledge of semi-opaque materials and their properties
  • Concept of light absorption and scattering
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of light dispersion through lenses
  • Study the inverse square law and its applications in optics
  • Explore the effects of surface area and opaqueness on light transmission
  • Examine the role of reflective materials in light behavior
USEFUL FOR

Optics enthusiasts, physics students, automotive engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of light behavior through various materials.

kasykid
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So i was wondering...if you have 2 surfaces of different areas..one bigger and one smaller...and the one with a smaller area disperses light through a lens..does more light travel through the one with the lens or the other or does the same amount of light travel through both?

To get further details into this question and how I came to it. I was thinking if you have 2 cars, one with a big headlight that had no lenses in front of it and one with a lens but smaller headlight and the headlights get covered with the exact same amount of dust...(the same thickness on a square cm) will one car have brighter headlights or just the same?(of course you have the same exact light source in both of them)
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hi kasykid, :welcome:

Apart from the fact that there are no cars without a lens in front or a mirror behind the lamp (*):
Opaqueness is generally the fraction of the incoming light that gets absorbed (or scattered). So it all goes proportional and the ratio between the brightnesses doesn't change if the grime layers are the same thickness.

(*) the inverse square law would mean there isn't enough lighting in the desired direction.
 
BvU said:
Hi kasykid, :welcome:

Apart from the fact that there are no cars without a lens in front or a mirror behind the lamp (*):
Opaqueness is generally the fraction of the incoming light that gets absorbed (or scattered). So it all goes proportional and the ratio between the brightnesses doesn't change if the grime layers are the same thickness.

(*) the inverse square law would mean there isn't enough lighting in the desired direction.

Thanks for the welcome :D

I know all cars have a mirror behind the lamp but some have a lens in front of it and some don't(my car has only the plasticky(or glass) material that has some indents but no actual lens,but it does have the mirror behind it).

I am not sure if you understood my question...in my scenario I imagine that because the area that the light leaves through is smaller for the light with a lens...there might be "more" photons of light that can escape in a smaller area(making it brighter) and on the other side the same amount of light will try to escape through a bigger dirty area making it dimmer?

I am sorry if I can't explain the problem correctly, I am not a native English speaker and I guess I can't explain things as I should.

Maybe if you ignore my scenario completely and could say if you have 2 boxes...that are coated with reflective material on the inside and one has a whole side that is just normal glass that does not change light's path but is dirty and one that has only a small part of a side(50% for example) with a lens that is also dirty and both have a light source of the same power. would more light escape the one with the lens or the one with the glass pane(assuming that all light is concentrated in the lens and is not lost or something.
 
To first approximation it would be the same, since the "dirt" absorbs a fixed fraction of the light that passes through it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
876
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
6K