How Does Movement Affect Heat and Thrust in Rocket Engines?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stewart Snider
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A stationary rocket engine producing 1000 kg of thrust generates heat from fuel combustion, but when it moves at 100 m/s, additional heat is produced in the brake due to friction, raising questions about energy conservation. The heat output from the fuel remains constant, but the kinetic energy of the exhaust changes relative to the ground, not the engine. The discussion highlights that the exhaust velocity is fixed relative to the rocket, leading to a lower velocity relative to the ground as the rocket moves. This distinction clarifies that the engine does not need to "know" it's moving; rather, the exhaust's kinetic energy is affected by the rocket's motion. The conversation ultimately seeks to reconcile the apparent contradiction in heat generation and energy conservation principles.
Stewart Snider
Consider a rocket engine held stationary that produces 1000 kg of thrust.
Now, allow that engine to move on a track at, say, 100m/s, controlling its velocity with a brake, keeping the fuel burn rate the same. The brake will get hot.

But since the fuel burn rate remains the same, the rocket's heat output remains the same as well, right? All we've done is allowed the thing to move. But with movement, we're generating heat in the brake in addition to the rocket exhaust. It would seem we're getting the heat from the brake for free. This violates the law of conservation of energy, so I know there must be a flaw here.

Can anyone tell me what I'm missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stewart Snider said:
Can anyone tell me what I'm missing?
The KE of the exhaust
 
Do you mean the kinetic energy of the exhaust decreases as the engine moves? If so, I don't understand how any part of the engine knows it's moving.
 
It doesn't need to know that it's moving. The exhaust exits with the same velocity with respect to the rocket but a lower velocity with respect to the ground because the rocket is moving.
 
Stewart Snider said:
Do you mean the kinetic energy of the exhaust decreases as the engine moves?
Yes.

Stewart Snider said:
If so, I don't understand how any part of the engine knows it's moving.
I don't understand what you are asking here. Can you ask your question without anthropomorphising?
 
Stewart Snider said:
Do you mean the kinetic energy of the exhaust decreases as the engine moves? If so, I don't understand how any part of the engine knows it's moving.

Ask yourself...

Does the rocket engine eject the exhaust gas at a fixed speed relative to the ground or the engine?
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top