How Does Particle P's Motion Change After 2 Seconds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JJ!
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the motion of particle P after 2 seconds, given its initial position, velocity, and constant acceleration. The particle starts at (2,6) and moves with a velocity of (3i + j) ms-1 and acceleration of (16i + 24j) ms-2. Participants emphasize the need to show calculations to confirm that the particle moves directly away from the origin O and to find its speed at that time. There is confusion about the approach and formulas required to solve the problem, with a suggestion that moving directly away from O might imply a northward direction. Overall, the thread seeks guidance on the correct mathematical methods to analyze the particle's motion.
JJ!
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help me with this question, please?

A particle P is initially at the point (2,6) in relation to an origin, O, and is moving with velocity (3i + j) ms-. It has constant acceleration (16i + 24j) ms-. Show that after 2 seconds it is moving directly away from O, and find its speed at that time.

I would greatly appreciate any help, also details of how to get the answer would be excellent!

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the forums. Please note that, for homework questions, you are required to show some work before we can help you. Also, in the future, please post in the relevant homework/coursework forum.

So, how do you think you'll approach this question?
 
Sorry about not posting this in the correct place.

Well with this question, I was not sure about what I need to work out. Considering it is asking for me to firstly show its moving directly away from O, I thought that this may mean that moving directly away is the same as traveling due North (where i = 0).

The initial point (2,6) in component form would be (2i + 6j) with a magnitude of 6.32.

Though I am unsure as to what formula I need to apply to calculate the answer. (sorry for sounding so uncertain!)
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top