How Does pH Affect the Solubility of Mg(OH)2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jesuslovesu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ion Solubility
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the solubility of Mg(OH)2 in a buffered solution at pH 8.80, with the expected solubility being 0.45 M or 26 g/L. The participant calculates the hydroxide ion concentration as [OH-] = 6.3 x 10^-6 and sets up the equilibrium expression for Mg(OH)2 dissociation. They derive a concentration of x = 1.65 x 10^-4 M but are unsure of the discrepancy with the expected answer. A key point raised is that in a buffered solution, the correct approach is to consider [OH-] solely as 6.3 x 10^-6, without adding 2x. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately accounting for hydroxide concentration in solubility calculations.
jesuslovesu
Messages
185
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the solubility of Mg(OH)2 in a solution buffered at pH 8.80.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


The answer is .45 M or 26 g/L but I can't get that for some reason.

I can find the concentration of hydroxide [OH-] = 6.3 x 10-6
Mg(OH)2 -> Mg+2 + 2OH-
...0+x,...6.3x10-6 + 2x

1.8x10-11 = x(6.3x10-6 + 2x)^2

x = 1.65 x 10-4 M (neglecting the 6.3 x10-6)
I've also tried solving the cubic with similar results.
Does anyone where I went wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solution is buffered. [OH-] is not 6.3x10-6 + 2x but JUST 6.3x10-6.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top