How does the compression of a magnetic field affect its strength?

AI Thread Summary
The compression of a magnetic field increases its strength due to the conservation of magnetic energy, particularly in highly conductive bodies. When a magnetic object like a star is compressed, the number of magnetic field lines remains constant while they become more closely spaced, leading to a stronger field. This phenomenon can be explained through the "square-cube law," where reducing the radius of a star decreases its volume, thus increasing energy density. For example, compressing a solar magnetic field from a million kilometers to a neutron star's 20 kilometers can amplify the field strength significantly, potentially reaching trillions of Gauss. Overall, the relationship between volume reduction and magnetic field strength enhancement is critical in understanding the behavior of magnetars and pulsars.
Enjoicube
Messages
48
Reaction score
1
Hello All,

I am trying to understand something I read in an article about magnetars and pulsars. The article states that when a magnetic object, such as a star, is compressed, the magnetic field strength increases. Intuitively, this seems true, as the number of field lines will remain constant, but they will become more closely spaced. How is this explained more technically?

One website I visited said the following

"Note, if you compress a magnetic field 'adiabatically' you amplify its strength. For example, a solar magnetic field is on average a few gauss for a star about 1 million kilometers in radius. If you compress this to the size of a neutron star which is 20 kilometers in radius, the magnetic field energy density ( B^2/8 pi) is amplified by the ratio of the volumes which is 1.25 x 10^14. The field strength increases by the square root of 8 x pi times this number or 56 million Gauss for a 1 Gauss initial field. Neutron star fields can be higher than this because the process of core collapse is not exactly adiabatic (ie conserving the magnetic field energy). For highly-conducting bodies, the conserved quantity is the product of the field strength times the radius squared so that for a real star collapsing to a neutron star, the field will increase by (2,000,000/20)^2 = 10 billion times so that a 100 Gauss surface field for a progenitor star that supernovas to become a neutron star, is amplified to a 1 trillion Gauss neutron star surface field"

However i couldn't find anything similar anywhere else.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is just a kind of "square cube law". The volume of a field is proportional to the radius^3, and energy density is proportional to the field^2. So if you half the radius then you decrease the volume by a factor of 8 so the energy density must be increased by a factor of 8 in order to keep the same total energy and therefore the field must be increased by a factor of sqrt(8).
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top