Originally posted by Zantra
Women.. I have spent years researching this, and in depth testing and evaluation. here are my results..
Wow, thanks!
Ok now that that's out of the way, let me just say that women aren't logical, they think with their emotions before anything else many times.
This is different than aggressive male behavior that isn't fueled by logic, how? Many more men are involved in physical confrontations than women, IMO, primarily due to the (perceived) female ability to reason and talk things out. Could it be that both genders are, at times, rendered incapable of thinking clearly because they are overwhelmed by emotion? This is more of a human folly (or strength, depending on context.)
Now before the women jump on me, let me say that there are ALWAYS exceptions to the rule, this is the case in ANY human equation.
I've known very logical women, and I've also known women who were not only intelligent and "one of the guys" but very attractive as well, so there goes that theory!
Unfortunately the stereotype that scientific men are ugly and socially maladjusted still remains.
If a woman asks you if she's fat, she doesn't want to hear the truth, she wants you to lie to her. She's seeking positive reinforcement, as it's known in psychological circles.
The counter-argument for this is the same - how are men different? I can think of a few different questions that might be posed which are similar but not verbatim which demonstrate that men also like having their ego stroked.
Entropia was right about one thing.. Women crave attention, and to feel good. So making them laugh and feel good about themselves is the right move.
Again, this same behavior can be found in men, as well as children and most domesticated animals. I wouldn't consider this groundbreaking knowledge.
"A man is already halfway in love with any woman who listens to him." -Brendan Francis
If we were to assume the quote above is true, how would you go about proving the differences between men and women? It seems that you could switch 'man' and 'woman' in the sentence and people would still say "That's so true!"
I have to say that so far I'm kinda disappointed by the women posting here, since I've heard a lot of generalizations women that are half-truths and twisted. I can cite examples if challenged.
I can't say that I've been extremely impressed by the posts here, but to say that you are disappointed by the *women* who have posted is kind of curious.
While I acknowledge the differences between women and men - primarily those that are backed up by hard science (i.e. women having larger corpus callosum's, different brain activity, more language centers, differences in hormones etc.) and how they relate to societal and evolutionary constructs - I think it's unfair to apply different standards for discourse on a discussion board. Gender should not be a factor when judging the substance of a reply. Thoughtfulness, insight, and merit should be more important.
BTW, please do cite specific references.
So I offer up my experience to you. You have a specific question about women. Ask me=) I'll try to impart experinces to the group.
No offense, but that's like asking Bill O'Reilly about the war instead of Tommy Franks.
edit: typos