Is There a Universal Algorithm for Hacking the Female Mind?

In summary, the conversation delves into the topic of relationships and the dynamics of liking and being liked more in a relationship. The participants discuss the possibility of a perfect balance and the difficulty in measuring emotions. They also mention different approaches to "hacking" into a female's mind and the importance of honesty in a relationship.
  • #1
eNtRopY
Recently, I was sent a SPAM entitled learn the kiss test. Apparently, these people believe they have a universal algorithm for determining the right time to kiss a girl. Although, I believe there exists a certain algorithm for getting intimate with any female, I believe all females are unique. Therefore, there is not a universal algorithm which applies to all.

Some females may require nothing more than a flattering compliment launched at a precise moment in time while others may require years of dating followed by a wedding. I suppose the real trick isn't so much about finding the right code as it is finding the right girl who will be subdued by the code that you tend to use.

For me, I always look for girls who look for me first. If I am in a public place, and I notice that a girl keeps making eyes at me, then that is the girl I pursue. I always make certain that in every situation I face, I have the upper-hand from the beginning. I think that life is easier when the girl you are with likes you more than you like her.

eNtRopY
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think that life is easier when the girl you are with likes you more than you like her.

That's interesting because a female friend of mine said <not verbatim>: "I think it's easier when the guy likes you more then you lke the guy."

Perhaps it's subjective?
 
  • #3
Originally posted by Sting
That's interesting because a female friend of mine said <not verbatim>: "I think it's easier when the guy likes you more then you lke the guy."

Perhaps it's subjective?


No, she is also right.

A relationship is always easier when the person you are with likes you more than you like him/her. It is easier when you are the cool one. It is easier when you are the sexy one. It is easier when you are the one who gets called rather than the one who makes the calls. It is when you are the one who climaxes second rather than first.

These are just facts of life.

Trust me, in terms of physical appearance, I would rather date a six or seven who actually likes me than a perfect ten who thinks she is God's gift to mankind anyday. Or, let me put this another way... I would never go for one of MSI's blah girls.

eNtRopY
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
A relationship is always easier when the person you are with likes you more than you like him/her. It is easier when you are the cool one. It is easier when you are the sexy one. It is easier when you are the one who gets called rather than the one who makes the calls. It is when you are the one who climaxes second rather than first.

Then I guess the "ideal" relationship is one where both parties feel that they are the ones that are "liked more".

But in reality, is that possible? If not, psychological?
 
  • #5
How often, in nature, do you find exactly matched quantities from two independent variables?

eNtRopY
 
  • #6
You bring up a point I was about to mention but not only that, how would you measure "feeling" in quantitaive terms?

But I'm digressing from the original topic.
 
  • #7
Originally posted by Sting
You bring up a point I was about to mention but not only that, how would you measure "feeling" in quantitaive terms?


If you could separate one variable (not possible as there are many multi facets when dealing with emotion), then I suppose you could apply a linear scale to it. You would need a 0 and a 1, and all other events could be given a number through interpolation or extrapolation.

I think that I would prefer a 10 who was up herself to a 6 who was obsessed with me. However, I would prefer a 9 who was obsessed with me over both.
 
  • #8
Perhaps there are some chemical reactions going on within the girl?
 
  • #9
If you could separate one variable (not possible as there are many multi facets when dealing with emotion), then I suppose you could apply a linear scale to it. You would need a 0 and a 1, and all other events could be given a number through interpolation or extrapolation.

I think that I would prefer a 10 who was up herself to a 6 who was obsessed with me. However, I would prefer a 9 who was obsessed with me over both.

How often, in nature, do you find exactly matched quantities from two independent variables?

eNtRopY

So this is what happens when nerds like us speak nerd in reference to females? I've never heard a conversation of this caliber before.
 
  • #10
OK, I think I have the formula:

y = mx+b*ln|ve^(bt)-v+1| -ln| (1-v)/e^(bt) + v / ( P*e^(r*t) )

.. oh, wait, that's just a bunch of useless gibberish

sorry
 
  • #11
I don't think anyone can hack into a female mind.
Let the females hack your mind, it's easier...I think...
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Originally posted by Astrophysics
I don't think anyone can hack in a female mind.
Let the females hack your mind, it's easier...I think...


It is easier...and they do.I've been hacked many times.
I kinda like it.
 
  • #13
I hope it's not scary...
 
  • #14
I have heard it said that the one who loves the least controls the realtionship.
 
  • #15
In order for a relationship to function it needs to be more good than bad for both of the people in the relationship. The magic ratio of subjective goodness to badness seems to be about 5 to 1. (This is BTW a result of empirical studies.)

For hacking approaches to females, you can look up 'speed seduction', 'sarging', or 'neuro linguistic programming' on google. Take all of it with a grain of salt.
 
  • #16
Females are very intuitive. They can hack your mind. They're a natural lie detector test without having gone through the FBI or CIA. So don't even think of trying to sell her a whopper because she will detect the subtle changes in your story the second time you say it.

Originally posted by eNtRopY

A relationship is always easier when the person you are with likes you more than you like him/her. It is easier when you are the cool one. It is easier when you are the sexy one. It is easier when you are the one who gets called rather than the one who makes the calls. It is when you are the one who climaxes second rather than first.
Good, this is what you call a Challenge. Women like it more if they're the one who are doing the chasing. And if she thinks that she likes you more.
 
  • #17
Originally posted by The_Professional
Females are very intuitive. They can hack your mind. They're a natural lie detector test without having gone through the FBI or CIA. So don't even think of trying to sell her a whopper because she will detect the subtle changes in your story the second time you say it.


It sounds to me like you are referring to another species. How funny. Don't any women post on these forums? (This is my first Physics Forums foray, and I've only looked at a few threads so far. I'm actually quite pleased to discover you can preview your post, because I've never used any of these HTML-like codelet things before.)
 
  • #18
Welcome to the forums, geek.grrl (did I spell that right?). Several of the posters here are women, check out the biology board where Monique rules, and there are others. Not me though. My daughter got her undergraduate degree in Industrial Engineering.

In addition to the HTML tags we have LaTex here (said he proudly). Don't forget to check it out.
 
  • #19
Originally posted by geek.grrl
It sounds to me like you are referring to another species. How funny.

But aren't women from Venus?
 

Related to Is There a Universal Algorithm for Hacking the Female Mind?

1. What is a universal algorithm for hacking the female mind?

A universal algorithm for hacking the female mind refers to a set of steps or instructions that claim to be able to manipulate or control the thoughts and behaviors of women. This concept is often associated with pick-up artists or individuals who believe that there is a specific formula for attracting and seducing women.

2. Is there any scientific evidence to support the idea of a universal algorithm for hacking the female mind?

No, there is no scientific evidence to support the idea of a universal algorithm for hacking the female mind. Attraction and relationships are complex and individual experiences that cannot be reduced to a one-size-fits-all formula. Additionally, the idea of "hacking" someone's mind is problematic and unethical.

3. Are there any ethical concerns with the concept of a universal algorithm for hacking the female mind?

Yes, there are several ethical concerns with the concept of a universal algorithm for hacking the female mind. It perpetuates harmful gender stereotypes and reduces women to objects to be manipulated. It also promotes manipulative and potentially abusive behaviors in relationships.

4. Can the idea of a universal algorithm for hacking the female mind be applied to all women?

No, the idea of a universal algorithm for hacking the female mind cannot be applied to all women. Every person is unique and has their own thoughts, feelings, and preferences. Assuming that all women can be manipulated in the same way is not only inaccurate but also disrespectful.

5. How can we combat the harmful effects of the idea of a universal algorithm for hacking the female mind?

We can combat the harmful effects of this idea by promoting healthy and respectful relationships. This includes rejecting the notion that there is a universal algorithm for manipulating women and encouraging individuals to develop genuine connections based on mutual respect and consent.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
756
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • New Member Introductions
Replies
2
Views
231
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
587
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top