nameVoid
- 238
- 0
x=e^(2t)
y=t+1
t= ( lnx ) / 2
y= ( lnx ) / 2 + 1
or
blah
y=t+1
t= ( lnx ) / 2
y= ( lnx ) / 2 + 1
or
blah
Last edited:
The discussion revolves around the transformation of the function from \( x = e^{2t} \) to \( x = e^{-2t} \), exploring the relationships between the variables \( x \), \( y \), and \( t \). Participants are examining the implications of this transformation in terms of graph representation and function behavior.
The discussion is active, with participants exploring different representations and questioning the transformation between the two forms of the function. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correctness of the expressions, but multiple interpretations are still being explored.
There is a mention of specific conditions for \( t \) and the implications for graphing, indicating that assumptions about the variable ranges are under consideration.
nameVoid said:x=e^(2t)
y=t+1
t= ( lnx ) / 2
y= ( lnx ) / 2 + 1
or
y= +- ( ( lnx ) / 2 + 1 ) ?
Is this the same question? How did "[itex]x= e^{2t}[/itex]" become [itex]x= e^{-2t}[/itex]?nameVoid said:x=e^(-2t)
y=t+1
Assuming you really did mean [itex]x= e^{-2t}[/itex], yes, that is correct.-2t=lnx
y=1-lnx/2
i suppose