How does the glottis affect stress and unstress sounds in English?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fxdung
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stress
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, participants explore the relationship between glottal width and stress in speech sounds. It is posited that during stressed sounds, the glottis is more open, while in unstressed sounds, it is narrower. The difficulty in perceiving unstressed sounds in English is highlighted, with a suggestion that the narrower glottis contributes to this challenge. Participants are encouraged to share their research findings on this topic, indicating a collaborative effort to understand the mechanics of glottal function in relation to stress and unstress in speech.
fxdung
Messages
387
Reaction score
23
Is that correct: in stress sound the glostis is more open and in unstress sound the glostis more narrow?
 
Science news on Phys.org
fxdung said:
Is that correct: in stress sound the glostis is more open and in unstress sound the glostis more narrow?
What research have you done to find the answer? What have you found?
 
I am very difficult to hear unstress sounds in English. I guess unstress sounds is made when glotis is more narrow.
 
The piece came-up from the "Lame Jokes" section of the forum. Someobody carried a step from one of the posts and I became curious and tried a brief web search. A web page gives some justification of sorts why we can use goose(s)-geese(p), but not moose(s)-meese(p). Look for the part of the page headed with "Why isn't "meese" the correct plural?" https://languagetool.org/insights/post/plural-of-moose/
Back
Top