How Does the Source of EMF Change with Movement in a Magnet and Coil System?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the differences in the origin of electromotive force (emf) in a system involving a magnet and a coil, specifically when either the magnet is stationary and the coil moves, or the coil is stationary and the magnet moves. Participants explore theoretical implications, mathematical considerations, and practical examples related to electromagnetic induction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that there is no difference in the origin of emf between the two scenarios, asserting that the only distinction arises if one of the objects is accelerating.
  • Others argue that the motion of the magnet or coil can lead to different conditions for inducing emf, particularly emphasizing the role of uniform versus non-uniform magnetic fields.
  • A participant notes that when the coil moves, motional emf is induced, while the motion of a magnet with a non-uniform field changes the field's magnitude at the coil's position, leading to emf according to Maxwell-Faraday Law.
  • Some contributions highlight that a stationary coil in a constant magnetic field experiences no emf unless there is a change in magnetic field strength or flux through the coil.
  • There are discussions about the mathematical representation of these scenarios, including line integrals and the concept of cutting magnetic field lines.
  • Participants also delve into practical applications, such as the operation of speakers, and how they relate to the principles of emf and magnetic fields.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the scenarios of moving the magnet or the coil yield different outcomes regarding emf. While some assert equivalence, others provide counterarguments based on specific conditions and mathematical principles, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of uniform and non-uniform magnetic fields, as well as the assumptions regarding the motion of the coil and magnet. The discussion also touches on the complexities of electromagnetic theory without reaching a consensus on the implications of these scenarios.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and related fields, particularly those exploring concepts of electromagnetism and electromagnetic induction.

  • #31
Marcusl, Can you make any sense out of this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
So interesting to see that people who talk about particles and forces on daily basis which are hidden from the naked eye then come back and have a hard discussion about a thing we have been using pretty successfully for the past 100+ years.

Well basically every loudspeaker behaves also like a microphone a little bit.I just tested that as I have plenty of them where i write from a simple everyday multimeter shows reading of 1-2 volts when moving the voice coil by hand.Every speaker is also a tiny microphone.And vice versa. But this is not of high importance as the speaker is designed to move according to the input voltage/amperage.And as every electromagnetic apparatus creates a back emf that tries to resist the change through the magnetic field lines.
The magnetic field of the magnet of the speaker has a south and north.One pole is where the coil enters from the face of the speaker the other pole is from the back where the sticker of brand and parameters usually are located.
The metal ends are just to end the magnet lines and the middle metal cylinder is to make the other pole of the magnet the one in the back to meet the one in the front and in between is the air gap and the coil is moving through that place of field lines going from N to S and pushes against those lines in a direction according to the applied polarity so the polarity changes in the exact frequency at which the music is playing so you hear sound.
So it's pretty similar to a linear motor that's moving back and forth at a certain frequency and in fact they do that all the time in assembly lines and other places.only the speaker is round because of it's properties and physics.

The speaker could still operate without the central metal cylinder but it would be very weak as the strength comes from bringing the opposite poles of the magnet together in a gap that is as tightly spaced as possible hence the magnetic force falls of with distance.And hence the metal is a good conductor of magnetic field it is used to bring the back pole of the magnet up front so that the could would have "two arms" with which to push itself instead of one long and skinny.Sorry for the somekind simple and maybe sometimes stupid explanation but I hope I did my best.
 
Last edited:
  • #33
Sounds good to me.
 
  • #34
arydberg said:
Marcusl, Can you make any sense out of this?
Your description of loudspeaker operation was accurate--the cylindrical voice coil sits within a radial magnetic field created by the magnet and its iron pole pieces. Current is driven through the coil by an audio amplifier, producing a Lorentz force parallel to its axis. Since the coil is attached to the speaker cone, this moves the cone in or out.

The question of induced emf is of little concern in this application except, perhaps, to the amplifier designer. Any coil has inductance and will produce a back emf in response to a changing current, and this appears across the amplifier terminals. In effect, the amplifier must be capable of driving a reactive load. I think the reactance is quite small, however, so the speaker looks largely like a 4 or 8 ohm resistive load.

This is a different situation from the original question in this thread, which involved an open-circuit coil moving in a magnetic field. In that case, the induced emf is of interest and, conversely, there is no current and no Lorentz force. That's why I think these two questions should have been asked in two separate threads.

If this is still unclear, please specify the point of confusion so we can clear it up.
 
  • #35
Thread closed for Moderation...

Thread re-opened. Let's be very clear and accurate in our posts in this thread please.

And, thread is closed again. Thanks folks.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
806
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K