How Does Time Dilation Affect Perception in Space Travel?

mcafej
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Ok, so I just watched the nova fabric of the cosmos (blew my mind). Anyways, suppose I jumped on top of a beam of light and road it as it traveled out into space. Now, suppose that as I was traveling out there, another person is coming at me in the exact opposite direction on another beam of light. According to Einstein, if I was holding a radar gun, it would still say that the person on the other beam of light was only going 671 million mph (roughly), but what I don't understand is that if we are going opposite directions, why would my radar gun not change? I understand that if i flew by an observer on a beam of light, space would warp in order to not allow me to exceed the speed of light, but how would I perceive the person coming at me if we were both on a beam of light? Obviously it would only be an instant that we would see each other, but how would we perceive time relative to each other? If I looked at my watch and he looked at his, and I could somehow see the speed of his watch, which would be ticking faster and which would slow down?

This is something that I have found fascinating, and I believe it is true, but it just blows my mind, and I'm really interested in it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
According to Einstein, you need to talk about speeds of objects and light with respect to or with reference to a coordinate frame. That's why it is called a reference frame. In Special Relativity, the coordinates of this frame are not warped, however, objects traveling at high speeds in this frame can be "warped", if by that you mean their clocks will run slower than the coordinate time of the frame and their rulers will be compressed along the direction of motion.

Also, according to Einstein, you are correct that you cannot exceed the speed of light but you also cannot achieve the speed of light. But your question will work even with speeds less than that of light so let's do it at 99% of the speed of light, Ok? Let's say that you are traveling at 99%c in one direction and far away is another observer coming towards you at the same speed (both speeds according to a frame of reference).

Your radar gun will determine that the other observer is not traveling at 198%c but rather 99.995%c. Look up "velocity addition" in wikipedia to see the formula to make this calculation.

As you are approaching the other observer, you will see his watch running faster than yours by a factor of 200. So during the time that your watch ticks out 1 second, you will see his tick 200 seconds. But he will also see yours ticking 200 times faster than his. Look up "relativistic Doppler" in wikipedia for the formula for this.

Then as you pass each other and look back at the other one, you each will see the other ones watch ticking more slowly than your own by a factor of 1/200.

Does this help clarify things for you?
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top