How Does Toughness Compare Between Martensite and Carbon Steel?

  • Thread starter Thread starter temaire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Steel
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on comparing the toughness of martensite and carbon steel, particularly in the context of a guitar string made of martensite versus a metal chain link made of carbon steel. Participants explore the implications of material properties on toughness, ductility, and design considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the metal chain link would have higher toughness than the guitar string due to its greater ductility and design for high tensile stresses.
  • Another participant agrees with the initial assessment but advises on proper image posting etiquette.
  • A different participant challenges the claim regarding the "steepness" of the stress-strain curves, stating that the Young's Modulus would be approximately identical for both materials.
  • Further clarification is provided that toughness is defined as the energy a material can withstand before failure, which is related to the area under the stress-strain curve.
  • It is noted that as strength increases and total elongation decreases, materials tend to be less tough, absorbing less energy before failure.
  • Ductility is discussed in relation to a material's ability to deform before failure, with a caution that most metals are designed to operate within the elastic region, where plastic deformation is generally undesirable.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the toughness comparison between martensite and carbon steel, with some agreeing on the general assessment while others contest specific claims about the stress-strain characteristics.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the definitions of toughness and ductility, as well as the implications of stress-strain curve characteristics on material performance.

temaire
Messages
275
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/2223/mateb.png


The Attempt at a Solution



Assuming that the guitar string is made of martensite and the metal chain link is made of carbon steel, I think that the metal chain link would have a higher toughness. My reasoning behind this is since martensite is very strong but not ductile, then the elastic region of its stress-strain curve would be steep and the plastic region would be very small before the string fails. On the other hand, the metal chain link is not as strong as the string but is a bit more ductile. The elastic region of its stress-strain curve would not be as steep, and the plastic region would last longer before failure. Therefore, the area under the stress-strain curve of the metal chain link would be greater than the area under the stress-strain curve of the string, as seen in the figure below.

[PLAIN]http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/3831/mate2.png

Also, looking at it from a design point of view, a metal chain link is obviously designed to withstand high tensile stresses, whereas a guitar string is only designed to withstand tensile stresses in the elastic region.

Is my understanding of the problem correct? Am I wrong with my choice?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
temaire: Your answer is correct. By the way, please do not post wide images directly to the forum page. Just post a text link to wide images.
 
temaire said:
...then the elastic region of its stress-strain curve would be steep and...
... The elastic region of its stress-strain curve would not be as steep...

This is not correct. The "steepness" or slope (Young's Modulus) of the elastic region would be approximately identical for the two steels.
 
temaire said:
Also, looking at it from a design point of view, a metal chain link is obviously designed to withstand high tensile stresses, whereas a guitar string is only designed to withstand tensile stresses in the elastic region.

Is my understanding of the problem correct? Am I wrong with my choice?
The key in the problem is found in the problem statement, "Basically, toughness is the amount of energy a material can withstand before it fails." The energy is measured by the area under the stress-strain curve, which gives the strain-energy density. As strength of a material increases (and total elongation decreases), the material is less tough, i.e., it absorbs less energy before failure.

Ductility is associated with the ability of a material to deform before failure. However, most metals are designed to operated well within the elastic region. Usually, permanent or plastic deformation is undesirable.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 94 ·
4
Replies
94
Views
15K