How Does Using ##m## Instead of ##M = 2m## Affect the Seesaw and Spring System?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the torque about the pivot point S in a seesaw and spring system. The user initially calculates the torque from the plate's weight and the spring force but overlooks the impact of using ##m## instead of the correct mass ##M = 2m## for the disk. It is clarified that the weight of the rod does not contribute to torque since it acts directly on the pivot. The confusion arises from the incorrect mass assumption, which affects the overall torque calculation. Accurate mass representation is crucial for determining the system's behavior.
hang
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
seesaw
Relevant Equations
torque
1618477092965.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question ask to find torque about the pivot point S.
I first find the torque due to gravity of the plate and then torque due to spring force.
I understand that the weight of the rod do no torque as it is acting on the pivot S.
Where have I gone wrong?
 
You used ##m## instead of ##M = 2m## for the mass of the disk.
 
Orodruin said:
You used ##m## instead of ##M = 2m## for the mass of the disk.
thank you so much
 
If have close pipe system with water inside pressurized at P1= 200 000Pa absolute, density 1000kg/m3, wider pipe diameter=2cm, contraction pipe diameter=1.49cm, that is contraction area ratio A1/A2=1.8 a) If water is stationary(pump OFF) and if I drill a hole anywhere at pipe, water will leak out, because pressure(200kPa) inside is higher than atmospheric pressure (101 325Pa). b)If I turn on pump and water start flowing with with v1=10m/s in A1 wider section, from Bernoulli equation I...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K