How Does Velocity Addition Impact Time Dilation in Rotating Objects?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the impact of velocity addition on time dilation in rotating objects, specifically focusing on points on a rotating disk, such as the Earth. Participants explore how different velocities at various points affect time dilation and how simultaneity is defined in different inertial frames, particularly when considering a frame moving with respect to the Earth.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that different points on a rotating object experience different velocities and thus should time dilate differently, with points on the equator being quicker than those at higher latitudes.
  • There is a suggestion that when considering a frame moving with respect to the Earth, the velocities of different points must be added vectorially, which complicates the analysis of time dilation.
  • One participant proposes that time dilation can be integrated over one rotation of the Earth, suggesting that all points at the same latitude experience the same time dilation when averaged.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of gravitational potential in time dilation for objects on Earth, potentially overshadowing the effects of rotational speed.
  • Mathematical expressions for proper time in relation to coordinate time are provided, indicating how to calculate time dilation for rotating observers.
  • There is a discussion about the definition of simultaneity in different frames, with some participants arguing that simultaneity can be well-defined in inertial frames, while others point out the complexities introduced by non-inertial frames.
  • Concerns are raised about the adequacy of defining simultaneity for rotating points, suggesting that without clear definitions, the question remains unresolved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the effects of velocity addition on time dilation and the definition of simultaneity in different frames. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on how to approach these complexities.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of simultaneity and the complexities introduced by non-inertial frames. The discussion also highlights the need for clarity in assumptions when addressing time dilation and velocity addition in rotating systems.

analyst5
Messages
190
Reaction score
2
As I've red, different points on the rotating disk, or rotating object have different velocities and so they should time dilate differently. Points on equator are for instance quicker than those in Scandinavia. When we take an inertial frame that has zero velocity with respect to the Earth as a whole (the Earth is rotating wrt to that frame but isn't moving inertially in any direction), we can observe that different points have different tangential velocities, so that points on Equator have different directions of motions, but same speed.

So my question is, if we take a frame that is traveling with some velocity wrt to Earth, how will the velocities add. I mean all points are traveling with a different direction, so how can we add their velocities to the velocity of our moving frame, and how will the time dilate wrt to that moving frame that I previously mentioned? And how will simultaneity be defined on that moving inertial frame considering the Earth as a worldtube that we're focused to? How will simultaneity differ between the moving frame and the frame which has the rotating points at rest?

I hope you understand my question.
Regards, analyst
 
Physics news on Phys.org
o my question is, if we take a frame that is traveling with some velocity wrt to Earth, how will the velocities add. I mean all points are traveling with a different direction, so how can we add their velocities to the velocity of our moving frame, and how will the time dilate wrt to that moving frame that I previously mentioned?
You'll get time dilation that depends on the current position of the object. Integrated over one rotation of earth, all points at the same latitude get the same time dilation.
Simultaneity is seen by an inertial frame, without issues from the rotating earth. Yes it will differ from inertial frames where a point on the surface is at rest (for a certain moment in time - it cannot stay at rest in an inertial frame as it is rotating around earth).
Summary: You don't want to consider Earth in a frame where the center of Earth is moving, it just makes everything messy.

By the way: for objects on earth, time dilation due to the gravitational potential is more relevant than the small rotation speed.
 
Suppose you have observers i=1,2,3,... with velocities \mathbf{v}_i w.r.t. an inertial frame S. Then you can calculate their proper times \tau_i in terms of the coordinate time t. For a world C_i of an observer i you'll get

\tau_i = \int_{C_i}d\tau = \int_0^T dt\,\sqrt{1-\mathbf{v}^2_i(t)}

For constant linear velocity with speed v_i this is simply

\tau_i = \sqrt{1-v^2_i} \,\cdot\,T

As usual the coordinate time T can be associated with the proper time of the inertial observer in S.

*****

Now consider rotation w.r.t. a fixed axis. For the the speed of rotating observers i at radius r_i and with i-independent angular velocity \omega you get

\mathbf{v}^2_i(t) = r_i^2\omega^2

and therefore

\tau_i = \int_{C_i}d\tau = \int_0^T dt\,\sqrt{1-r_i^2\omega^2} = \sqrt{1-r_i^2\omega^2} \,\cdot\,T

As usual the coordinate time T can be associated with the proper time of the inertial observer in S.

*****

Now the next step would be to add linear motion and rotation. This is straightforward, but rather messy in detail. First you start with translation \mathbf{v}^\text{trans} w.r.t. the inertial frame of the Earth S, then you add the above mentioned rotation \mathbf{v}_i^\text{rot}(t) w.r.t. the moving inertial frame S'. Note that both velocities are vectors.

You have to use the relativistic addition formula

\mathbf{v}_i(t) = \mathbf{v}^\text{trans} \oplus \mathbf{v}_i^\text{rot}(t^\prime)

which you can find here

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velocity-addition_formula

This can be rather complex depending on the orientation of the vectors. You should consider some examples like
a) translation along the z-axis and rotation around z'-axis
b) translation in the xy-plane and rotation around z'-axis

Note that due to the rotation you'll get a time-dependent total velocity and you have to use the general formula

\tau_i = \int_{C_i}d\tau = \int_0^T dt\,\sqrt{1-\mathbf{v}^2_i(t)}

Caveat: don't forget that rotation around the z'-axis will be expressed in terms of t' like

\mathbf{v}_i^\text{rot}(t^\prime) = r_i\omega\left( \begin{array}{c} \sin (\omega t^\prime) \\ -\cos (\omega t^\prime) \\ 0 \end{array} \right)

Before you can perform the dt-integration you have to transform to coordinate time t.
 
analyst5 said:
As I've red, different points on the rotating disk, or rotating object have different velocities and so they should time dilate differently. Points on equator are for instance quicker than those in Scandinavia. When we take an inertial frame that has zero velocity with respect to the Earth as a whole (the Earth is rotating wrt to that frame but isn't moving inertially in any direction), we can observe that different points have different tangential velocities, so that points on Equator have different directions of motions, but same speed.
You can easily determine the speed of any point on the surface of the Earth just from the geometry. That determines the Time Dilation of these points. Assuming that all the points were synchronized to time zero at the Coordinate Time zero of the inertial frame, you can easily determine the Proper Time for any point (event) as a function of the Coordinate Time by simply dividing by gamma which is a constant for each point. Once you determine the Proper Time for any event, it will be the same Proper Time in all other frames.

analyst5 said:
So my question is, if we take a frame that is traveling with some velocity wrt to Earth, how will the velocities add. I mean all points are traveling with a different direction, so how can we add their velocities to the velocity of our moving frame, and how will the time dilate wrt to that moving frame that I previously mentioned?
You don't need to calculate the velocities to determine the Proper Time at each point as a function of the Coordinate Time in the new inertial frame, Just use the Lorentz Transformation process. As I said before, each event has the same Proper Time in all frames. So if you care about Time Dilation in this new frame, you just compare the delta Coordinate Time to the delta Proper Time for any pair of events.

analyst5 said:
And how will simultaneity be defined on that moving inertial frame considering the Earth as a worldtube that we're focused to?
Simultaneity is defined as two events having the same Coordinate Time.

analyst5 said:
How will simultaneity differ between the moving frame and the frame which has the rotating points at rest?

I hope you understand my question.
Regards, analyst
Simultaneity has a well-defined meaning in inertial frames and we can easily transform to any other inertial frame and establish a new well-defined set of simultaneities. But if you want to go to a non-inertial rest frame for the rotating points, YOU have to define what you mean by simultaneity. You can't ask us to answer a question for which you have not provided adequate information. I hope you realize that there is not a single answer to your question.

And I would like to ask you a question: why do you care about simultaneity for the rotating points at rest?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K