How does water repel for a split sec?

AI Thread Summary
When diving into water, there is a brief moment where the surface appears to repel the diver due to the water's inability to flow quickly enough around the solid object. This phenomenon can be dangerous, as the impact can lead to injuries like a broken neck. Surface tension may contribute to this effect, but the primary factor is the incompressibility of water, which prevents it from yielding immediately upon impact. If the force of the dive is strong enough, the water cannot move out of the way fast enough, leading to the initial repulsion. Understanding this interaction is crucial for safe diving practices.
u83rn00b
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
This has always fasinated me, I am only like a kid so don't hate me!
:confused: When u dive into water, as soon as you hit, for a millionith of a second, the surface of the water kind of repels you. It is enough to (from a headdive) break your neck. But after that slight millionth of a second, the water kind of absorbs u.. How is it this happens? can any1 help mee?? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Surface tension.
 
I think it's more a question of whether the water can move out of the way quickly enough. If you hit it hard enough, it can't flow around you. If the issue were surface tension, you could remove the effect with detergents.
 
Bing! Bing! Congratulation's cesiumfrog, you win a car!
 
I wouldn't be surprised if surface tension plays some role. But as Cesiumfrog said, it's probably that the water can't flow quickly enough. This is because water, like all liquids, is incompressible, and if it doesn't flow around a solid, it won't give way for that solid by any other means.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top