How Does Wolf Population Dynamics Affect Moose Numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter apchemstudent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mind Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on how wolf population dynamics affect moose numbers, emphasizing the relationship between predator and prey populations. The formula for wolf population growth suggests that the term rN, which represents the actual change in wolf population, directly influences moose numbers by altering predator pressure. While factors like the initial population (N) and carrying capacity (K) are acknowledged, they are seen as indirect influences on moose populations. Ultimately, the consensus is that rN is the most significant factor affecting moose numbers due to its direct correlation with wolf population changes. Understanding these dynamics requires a problem-solving approach, akin to physics, to analyze cause and effect in ecological systems.
apchemstudent
Messages
220
Reaction score
0
I know this might be a biology question. But I think this requires the problem solving minds of people in physics.

The population of the wolves influences the change in population of the mooses. When the population of the wolves increase, the mooses' population also increase. From the population growth formula of the wolves

delta N/delta t = rN(K-N)/K

which factor affects the population of the mooses?

a)r

b)N

c)K

d) rN

e)delta t


I picked d) because N represents the initial population, which doesn't affect the population of the mooses if it doesn't change.

r is the rate of change in populations, which can affect it i guess but rN denotes the actual change in population.

K is the carrying capacity of the population of the wolves. It can affect the population of the mooses, but it does not directly affect it( it will result in the change in population of wolves and then change in mooses)

So i think the best answer is d)... What do you people think? please give an explanation for your answer. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please ask your questions in only one place. It has been answered in biology.
 


I agree with your reasoning that d) rN would be the best answer. Let's break it down further to understand why.

As you mentioned, N represents the initial population, so it does not directly affect the population of the mooses unless it changes.

r represents the rate of change in population, which can indirectly affect the population of the mooses through its influence on the wolves' population. However, it is not the sole factor as the carrying capacity (K) also plays a role.

K, the carrying capacity, is the maximum population size that an environment can sustain. As the population of wolves (and therefore the number of predators) increases, the carrying capacity may be reached, leading to a decrease in the moose population. However, this is an indirect effect and is not the sole factor affecting the moose population.

On the other hand, d) rN represents the actual change in population of the wolves. This directly affects the number of predators in the environment, which in turn affects the population of mooses. Therefore, it can be considered as the most significant factor in determining the population of mooses.

In summary, while all the factors mentioned (r, N, K) can affect the population of mooses, d) rN is the most direct and influential factor. This is why a physics mind may be needed as they are trained to think in terms of cause and effect, and to identify the most significant factors in a system.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top