How Effective Is a Movable Center of Gravity in a Pinewood Derby Car Design?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effectiveness of a movable center of gravity in the design of Pinewood Derby cars, focusing on the physics principles involved in acceleration and the impact of center of mass during different phases of the race. Participants explore theoretical implications and practical considerations related to car design in a competitive context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a design where a heavy object moves within the car to alter the center of gravity, suggesting it could enhance acceleration down the ramp.
  • Another participant requests clarification on the physics behind the proposed design, indicating a need for a deeper understanding of the concepts involved.
  • A participant explains that the center of mass at the front of the car would increase the gravitational pull down the ramp, potentially leading to greater acceleration.
  • One participant challenges the initial proposal, arguing that the gravitational force acting on the car is dependent on the total mass and the angle of the ramp, suggesting that the position of the center of mass may not significantly affect performance.
  • There is a discussion about the behavior of the center of mass when the car is parallel to the ground, with one participant asserting that the center of mass does not matter in that scenario, as the ball would remain at the front due to deceleration.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of having weight positioned towards the rear of the car to maximize speed advantage on the ramp.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the impact of the center of mass on the car's performance, with some supporting the idea of a movable center of gravity while others argue that it may not provide a significant advantage. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the effectiveness of the proposed design.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding of Newtonian physics and express a desire for further clarification on the principles discussed. The conversation includes assumptions about the effects of gravity and acceleration that are not fully explored.

Ismael Nunez
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone! This is my first post, so excuse my improper etiquette (if any). Anyways, the Pinewood Derby, just in case you guys are unfamiliar with it, is an event that is held as a competition where small, homemade cars, race. The track is contains a ramp, which then leads onto a flat surface.
Although I have not personally competed in this competition, I do have a design proposal for it. Without further or do, here it is:

http://s6.postimg.org/3z396dl8h/PWD.png

So, the basic idea is that the car will have a container on it that will house a relatively heavy object that can move freely. As the car goes down the ramp, the center of gravity, represented by the ball, will move forward, making the acceleration of the car increase. Then, as the car becomes parallel to the ground, the ball (center of gravity) will move to the back, which will in return will reduce the acceleration. The point of the moving center of gravity is that it will provide more acceleration for the car going down the ramp, as opposed to a regular car with a permanent center of gravity.

To culminate, please express your ideas and comments on my proposal! Tell me my mistakes, and please give me an explanation behind any hypothesis you make! Thank you!

(NOTE: Disregard the aerodynamic and frictional factors on my design)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you please explain the physics involved in your proposal?

Cheers,
Terry
 
@tduell Hey! Thanks for the reply! Well, I'm merely just an amateur with Newtonian and Classical Physics, but I will try to give an explanation using my current knowledge. When the car is set at the top of the ramp, the center of mass, represented by the ball in the diagram, will be at the front of the car. With the center of mass at the front of the model, the gravity will "pull" it down with more force. Thanks to the triangular shape of the ramp, the force will be transferred to the diagonal direction, which in turn will provide more acceleration in that direction as opposed to a car model with the center of mass at the center itself.

Well, that's as thorough of a physical explanation that I can give. I know I am subject to mistake, so please, help me! Thanks!

-ultimateish
 
I think you are mistaken. I reckon the "pull" due to gravity is the M*g*sin(theta) (theta is angle to horizontal) and M=the total mass of the car. I reckon it doesn't make any difference where your centre of mass is located.
That's how I see it, and hopefully others will correct me if I'm wrong.

Cheers,
Terry
 
@tduell Ah. I see. Thank you! I will research more about this topic. Honestly, this idea was developed with my minuscule knowledge on Newtonian Physics and my intuition. So, thanks for correcting me!

-ultimateish
 
@tduell Also, your reply was in regards to when the car was going down the ramp, correct? What about when the car is parallel to the ground? Will the center of mass matter?

-ultimateish
 
tduell said:
I reckon the "pull" due to gravity is the M*g*sin(theta) (theta is angle to horizontal) and M=the total mass of the car. I reckon it doesn't make any difference where your centre of mass is located.

This is correct.

Ismael Nunez said:
What about when the car is parallel to the ground? Will the center of mass matter?

No, except the ball will not move toward the back of the car as you have shown when on level ground. Since the car is decelerating on the flat part, the ball will stay pinned in the front of the car.
 
@berkeman Ah, I see. Thanks a lot!

-ultimateish
 
You want as much weight as possible to start as far rearward as possible. That gives you an edge because the rear wheels are on the steep starting ramp longer. Any initial speed advantage pays off for the remainder of the course.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #10
@jbriggs444 Ah, I see. I guess I misunderstood the concept. Thyanks a lot for the info!

-ultimateish
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K