How Fast Does a Rock Fall on Jupiter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Coastal
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

An astronaut drops a rock from a height of 1.05 meters on Jupiter, where the acceleration due to gravity is 24.8 m/s². To calculate the final velocity just before impact, the correct approach is to use the formula Vf = √(2 * g * d), which simplifies the process by eliminating the need to first calculate time. The initial attempt to find time by dividing distance by acceleration was incorrect, as it resulted in incorrect units. Ultimately, using the kinematic equations yields the correct final velocity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations
  • Knowledge of gravitational acceleration
  • Familiarity with units of measurement in physics
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of kinematic equations
  • Learn about gravitational acceleration on different celestial bodies
  • Practice problems involving free fall and final velocity calculations
  • Explore the implications of gravity on motion in various environments
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in understanding motion under gravitational forces on different planets.

Coastal
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An astronaut on Jupiter drops a rock straight downward from a height of 1.05 m. If the acceleration of gravity on Jupiter is 24.8 m/s2, what is the speed of the rock just before it lands?

Homework Equations


g=24.8m/s2
speed=distance/time

The Attempt at a Solution


At first i attempted to simply multiply 24.8 and 1.05, but realized that was probably wrong. I then calculated t by dividing 1.05 by 24.8 and got t=.042. Then used speed = distance/time to get s=1.05/.042 to get 1.04m/s. Does this sound correct, or is it way off? Would just like to know if this is the right method or if my answer is right. Thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your approach is wrong. If we divide (1.05m)/(24.8m/s2) we do not get the unit of second, instead we get second2, which isn't right for time. Also I'm not sure why you even want to divide distance by acceleration. You need to use a pair of kinematic equations for this:

vf = vi * at
d = vi*t + 1/2*a*t2
vi - initial velocity
d - distance

You first need to find the time it took to fall, then you can find the final velocity (vf).
 
Last edited:
The problem I am working on corresponds with a problem in a book I have that also has an answer. I used to formula V= Square root of 2*g*x (formula of velocity as a function of position). This V was listed as the answer for the final velocity in the book. Instead, I manipulated the velocity as a function of time formula (v=gt) to t=v/g, to get the time (I got .29s), then put that into the formula Vf=Vi*at. I copied this method for the book problem and got a different answer than the one the book got.

So... is my formula not correct, or would Vf simply be the square root of 2gx?
 
The problem I am working on corresponds with a problem in a book I have that also has an answer. I used to formula V= Square root of 2*g*x (formula of velocity as a function of position). This V was listed as the answer for the final velocity in the book.
Ah, yes. This was an easier formula to use rather than find time, then find the final velocity.
I manipulated the velocity as a function of time formula (v=gt) to t=v/g, to get the time (I got .29s), then put that into the formula Vf=Vi*at. I copied this method for the book problem and got a different answer than the one the book got.
Not sure exactly what you did, but the time it took for the object to reach Vf is Vf/g. When you multiply g and t, you must obviously get Vf.
So... is my formula not correct, or would Vf simply be the square root of 2gx?
Yup. You'd get the same answer if you used the two equations I gave you, or use square root of 2*a*d.
 
Yep, that worked fine. Thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K