How Fast Was the Bullet in the Inelastic Collision?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of a bullet that strikes a 40-kilogram box, causing it to swing upward by 0.02 meters. To solve this, conservation of energy is applied first to find the velocity of the box immediately after the bullet embeds itself, using the formula mgh = (1/2)mv^2. Once the velocity of the bullet-box combination is determined, conservation of momentum is used to backtrack and find the bullet's original speed. The initial velocity of the box is zero, simplifying the calculations. The problem assumes an instantaneous collision between the bullet and the box.
wessleym
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Here's a question for anyone out there who would really like to less than moderately challenge their physics skills:
There is a 40 kilogram box hanging from the ceiling, at rest. A bullet with a mass of 0.01 kilogram hits it, forcing it to swing back on the ropes. As it swings back, it gets 0.02 meters off of the ground. Assume the box's bottom remains parellel with the ground. How fast was the bullet moving? Thanks to anyone who can figure this one out!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(Sounds like a homework question)

You can do this in two parts, moving backwards in events. First, you can use conservation of energy to determine the velocity of the box at the instant it absorbed the bullet ( mgh = (1/2)mv^2 ). Here, "m" is the mass of the box-bullet combo.

Once you have "v" of the bullet-box combo, you can use conservation of momentum to determine what the original velocity of the bullet was
( (mass bullet-box combo)(velocity) = (mass bullet)(velocity bullet) + (mass box)(velocity box) )

Of course the initial velocity of the box is zero, so it all works out nicely.


* All of this assumes an "instant" collision between the bullet and the box.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top