How High Must a Propeller Fall to Match Its Rotational Energy?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the height from which a rotating airplane propeller must fall to match its rotational kinetic energy. The context includes concepts of gravitational potential energy and rotational kinetic energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the conservation of energy principle, equating potential energy to rotational kinetic energy. They express confusion over the correctness of their calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants engage in clarifying the original poster's calculations and question the units used in the final answer. There is an indication of productive direction as the original poster realizes a potential oversight regarding the required units.

Contextual Notes

The original poster's calculations are based on the assumption that the propeller's initial kinetic energy can be converted entirely into gravitational potential energy, and there is a mention of unit conversion requirements that may have affected the outcome.

rleung3
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
An airplane propeller is 2.08 m in length (from tip to tip) with mass 117 kg. The propeller is rotating at 2400 rev/min about an axis through its center. Its rotational kinetic energy is 1.33x10^6 J. If it were not rotating, how far would it have to drop in free fall to acquire the same kinetic energy?

I tried using this equation:

K1 (becomes 0) +U1 = K2+U2 (becomes 0)

since the object would start from rest, K1=0. I will call the height of the object y=h, and the point at which it reaches required kinetic energy will be at y=0

U1 = K2
mgh = 1.33x10^6 J
h=(1.33x10^6 J)/(mg)

But that answer is wrong. The computer doesn't give me the right answer, but it says that one is wrong. Any thoughts? Thank you.

Ryan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks right to me. What was the exact answer that you put in?
 
I put in 1159 m (1.33x10^6 J)/(117g). It usually leaves room for errors up to 10%.
 
OOHH! Nevermind..it wanted the answer in km and I put it in m. Stupid me!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K