How Is Electric Flux Calculated Using Gauss's Law for a Nonconducting Cylinder?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating electric flux using Gauss's Law for a long solid nonconducting cylinder with a uniform charge density of 3.7 C/m³ and a radius of 0.65 meters. The correct approach involves determining the charge enclosed by the cylinder and using the formula Φ = Q_enclosed / ε₀, where ε₀ is the permittivity of free space (8.85 x 10^-12 C²/(N·m²)). A critical error identified was the misunderstanding of the question, which specifically asked for the flux through the sides of the cylindrical container, not the ends. The charge density was also incorrectly assumed to be in C/m³ instead of μC/m³, leading to incorrect calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with electric flux and its calculation
  • Knowledge of charge density and its units
  • Basic calculus for integrating over cylindrical surfaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of Gauss's Law and its applications in electrostatics
  • Learn how to calculate electric flux through different geometrical surfaces
  • Study the conversion between charge density units (C/m³ to μC/m³)
  • Practice problems involving cylindrical Gaussian surfaces and electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of electric flux calculations in nonconducting materials.

physicsfun
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A long solid nonconducting cylinder has radius r = 0.65 meters. It has a uniform charge density of 3.7 C/m3. Consider a cylinderical container concentric with the charged cylinder, with radius R = 1.5 m, and length L = 2 m.

Calculate the flux through the barrel of the cylindrical container.

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought this problem would be pretty simple. Since the charged cylinder is enclosed by the cylindercal container, I used Gauss's law to calculate the net electric flux. I used the equation

Electric Flux = Charge Enclosed / 8.85 * 10 ^ -12

The first step I took was to calculate the charge enclosed. To do this I just multiplied the charge density by the volume. 3.7 * .65^2*pi*2 = 9.8.

Then, I just divided that number by the constant Eo, 9.8/(8.*5 * 10^-12).

However this did not give me the right answer. Help! What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I can tell the relationship is pretty simple... Flux is simply the charged enclosed divided by espsilon... but obviously I'm not getting something! What aren't I understanding? Or is this particular relationship not applicable to this problem?
 
Your equation is right for the total Net flux.

But the question is asking for just the flux through the barrel end isn't it?
 
Nope, the question is asking for the flux through the sides of the barrel. Part (a) and (b) of the question asked for the flux through the top and the bottom of the barrel, to which I correctly answered zero.
 
Try using a cylindrical Guassian surface. First, find E as a function of r then since

\Phi=\oint{\vec{E}\bullet\ \mbox{d}\vec{S}

this should give you the flux through the side of the barrel.
 
I tried that and I keep getting the wrong answer, I converted sigma to lamba (charge per unit length) and used the relationship that E = lamba / (2*pi*epsilon*radius). Then I multiplied E by the surface area of the "container", 2*pi*radius*length... but this keeps yielding the wrong answer... also for the radius in calculating the electric field do I use the radius of the gaussian surface (the container) or do I use the radius of the charged cylinder? I tried both but still got the wrong answer...

What am I doing wrong here?
 
I see so the line is much longer than the cylinder and it's not closed. This makes it much simpler. So your charge density can be expressed as what?

Figure then that the linear charge density (λ) from the volume charge number (σ) that they gave you as λ = σ*A = 3.7*103*π*(.65)²

With Qnet then being the charge inside that's just λ*ΔL isn't it?

Φnet = Qneto = λ*ΔL/εo
 
I had the exact same problem with this question and I was convinced that I was correct with the same method you orginaly used. I have already spent an hour and a half on this single question and now I'm quite angry about what the solution was.

The problem was that they had the wrong question asked in the first place. The uniform charge density was supposed to be in \muC (10^{-6}C). Unlike most of the other problems, they didn't tell you if you had a simple sign error. The professor has now since changed the question, so just go back and see if you can get the correct answer.

I was pissed too.
 
  • #10
Thanks so much specialkick23... much appreciated
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
841
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K