How Is High Energy Physics as Career?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread discusses career prospects in high energy physics (HEP), comparing it to fields like astrophysics and condensed matter physics. Participants explore job opportunities, salary expectations, and the attractiveness of HEP as a career choice in light of current economic conditions and institutional hiring practices.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about salary and job opportunities at institutions like CERN and Fermilab, questioning if HEP offers more prospects than astrophysics and theoretical physics.
  • One participant reflects on the past state of HEP careers, noting that while the LHC increased demand for graduate students, it did not significantly increase permanent positions, leading to a surplus of candidates without secure jobs.
  • Another participant suggests that only the top 3% of HEP students may find excellent career prospects, advising others to consider alternative plans if they are unsure of their standing.
  • A participant expresses concern that current budget issues in the US and UK make HEP less attractive compared to other physics fields.
  • There is a discussion about the potential career paths for physics PhDs outside of academia, with some expressing a desire to avoid roles in finance.
  • Participants mention that experimental HEP may offer opportunities in instrumentation and data acquisition, while theoretical HEP's prospects are less clear.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express mixed views on the attractiveness of HEP as a career. While some highlight potential opportunities, others emphasize the challenges and uncertainties in securing stable positions. No consensus is reached on the overall career outlook.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the influence of economic conditions and institutional hiring practices on career prospects in HEP, highlighting the dependence on external funding and the competitive nature of the field.

SuperStringboy
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Lot of people asking about the jobs and salary of Astrophysics and i have also asked before. Now i ask about high energy physics..What about salary at CERN and Fermilab ? and is it has more job opportunities than Astrophysics and theoretical physics at usa or europe?

What do you say?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's funny, because HEP was in a terrible state career wise not long ago. With the LHC coming online everyone talked about how things would be better, and I thought it was reasonable.

We were naive. The LHC has created huge demand for graduate students, but has increased the number of actual permanent positions by a very small number. So more people than ever are on the train to nowhere.

A similar thing happened six or eight years ago, where the NIH had its budget doubled and yet permanent positions increased by around. . . zero. Why hire permanent positions that are really expensive when you can haul in graduate students who are cheap?

What do you say?

I say that the top 3% of all students who study HEP - the ones who excel at ever level, the ones who attend the top schools, the ones who get the big-name advisors - will have excellent career prospects and lead fulfilling lives. If you aren't sure you're in that subset, look elsewhere, or at least have a great backup plan.
 
Right now, with the current budget debacle in the US and UK, high energy physics does not look very attractive as a career. It wasn't that attractive before when compared to condensed matter/atomic/medical physics, but it is worse now.

Zz.
 
Last edited:
ZapperZ, what would your thoughts on the current career for HEP be? More attractive than 08? Less attractive than 08?
 
I think it has a lot of POTENTIAL....get it? :)
 
was that stemming from sarcasm or were you serious?
 
Grad student in high energy astro here. Question: if you're not doing condensed matter, then precisely what can you do with a PhD in physics outside of academia that still involves doing physics? Because I really don't want to become a quant on Wall Street who writes ROOT scripts to predict market forces.
 
I think there is also demand in industry for people with a Ph.D. in optics.

But for astrophysics, I think your alternatives are either academia or NASA.
 
Are you talking about experimental or theoretical HEP ?

As an experimentalist, there are a lot of opportunities in instrumentation, like in medical imaging, on synchrotrons or in the nuclear sector, or in the data acquisition business which is even larger.
 
  • #10
What about theoretical HEP? or theoretical nuclear physics?
 
  • #11
arunma said:
Because I really don't want to become a quant on Wall Street who writes ROOT scripts to predict market forces.

Don't lay awake at night worrying about ending up with a job on Wall Street. It probably wouldn't happen if you wanted.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
10K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K