How is information lost if nothing passes the event horizon?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the information paradox related to black holes, specifically addressing how information behaves as objects approach and cross the event horizon. Participants explore theoretical implications, observational perspectives, and the nature of information retrieval in the context of black holes.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification, Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that from an outside observer's perspective, objects approaching the event horizon appear to slow down and never fully cross it, suggesting that information can always be retrieved.
  • Others clarify that while information can be observed from above the event horizon, once an object crosses it, no further information can be retrieved from that object, as no signals can escape the event horizon.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of time dilation and whether an object actually passes the event horizon in any reference frame, with some asserting that it does while others express confusion over the implications of time dilation.
  • Participants raise concerns about proposed solutions to the information paradox potentially violating causality, particularly regarding the possibility of information escaping the black hole through mechanisms like Hawking radiation.
  • Some participants emphasize that the outside observer's inability to see events occurring inside the event horizon does not negate the occurrence of those events.
  • There is a debate about the limitations of electromagnetic measurements in retrieving information about objects near or inside the event horizon, with some questioning whether this constitutes a true paradox.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of information retrieval and the implications of crossing the event horizon. There is no consensus on the resolution of the information paradox, and multiple competing perspectives remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the concepts involved, including the dependence on definitions of time, observation, and the nature of spacetime geometry. There are unresolved questions regarding the implications of time dilation and the nature of information beyond the event horizon.

greypilgrim
Messages
583
Reaction score
44
Hi.

From an outside observer's view, any object approaching the event horizon of a black hole appears to slow down and never quite pass through the horizon. So information about those objects can always be retrieved (if you correct for the redshift). So what actually is the information paradox about?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
greypilgrim said:
Hi.

From an outside observer's view, any object approaching the event horizon of a black hole appears to slow down and never quite pass through the horizon. So information about those objects can always be retrieved (if you correct for the redshift). So what actually is the information paradox about?
It is about the fact that regardless of what you see, what matters is what HAPPENS, which is that the object doesn't even know the event horizon is there and just keeps falling to the singularity.

EDIT: to expand slightly, what you can "see" is just the information that is available from visible light. That doesn't tell you everything about the object. For example, what would photons from the object tell you about its charge?

EDIT #2: I should not have said "visible" light, I should have said "the electromagnetic spectrum". CrazyNinja's post directly below is perhaps a more straightforward explanation.
 
Last edited:
Lets split this into two cases:

1) The object (lets take it to be a radio source) is JUST about to fall into the event horizon. It sends out a pulse at this time t=0. We(the observers) CAN receive this signal. Hence we have information about the source falling through.

2) The radio has fallen beyond the event horizon (as @phinds says IT doesent know that it has fallen through) at t=T sec. Let's say it emits a pulse at t=T+1 sec. Now this pulse CANNOT reach us, for no radiation escapes the event horizon. Thus we have no information about the radio now. (or so we think).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds
CrazyNinja said:
2) The radio has fallen beyond the event horizon (as @phinds says IT doesent know that it has fallen through) at t=T sec. Let's say it emits a pulse at t=T+1 sec. Now this pulse CANNOT reach us, for no radiation escapes the event horizon. Thus we have no information about the radio now. (or so we think).

Ok, but for the outside observer the emission of this second pulse never happens, or only in an infinite future. Why do we assume that he somehow needs to receive information about an event that doesn't even take place in his reality?

Also, wouldn't some of the proposed solutions to the information paradox violate causality? Let's say there is a way information about the second pulse can escape the black hole (e.g. through Hawking radiation). So we could measure it and conclude there is a second pulse from inside the event horizon, while at the same time observing the radio still being outside (since it never passes through in our outside reference frame).
 
Such an event were it possible would simply confirm what we already knew which was that the radio did in fact fall past the event horizon.
 
I might have misunderstood something about black holes. I was under the impression that for any outside observer, the object DOES NOT actually pass the event horizon, because time dilation diverges. Is this wrong? Reading your posts, it sounds like also in the outside reference frame the object DOES pass the event horizon, we just can't observe it because the light gets more and more delayed.

phinds said:
EDIT: to expand slightly, what you can "see" is just the information that is available from visible light. That doesn't tell you everything about the object. For example, what would photons from the object tell you about its charge?

Is this really a problem? Pretty much all we know about the universe is obtained by EM measurements, i.e. (radio-)telescopes. Nobody would call this a paradox just because we cannot measure charge directly.
 
greypilgrim said:
information about those objects can always be retrieved

Information from a finite portion of the worldlines of those objects can be retrieved. But it's only a portion--the portion above the horizon. Information from events on the objects' worldlines that are at or below the horizon cannot be retrieved from outside the horizon.

greypilgrim said:
for the outside observer the emission of this second pulse never happens

The outside observer can never see it, but that doesn't mean it doesn't happen. We have had many, many threads on this.

greypilgrim said:
I was under the impression that for any outside observer, the object DOES NOT actually pass the event horizon, because time dilation diverges. Is this wrong?

Yes. The object actually passes the horizon; that is a geometric fact about spacetime and the object's worldline, independent of any observer. The outside observer cannot see the object pass the horizon because light rays from that event can't escape.

greypilgrim said:
it sounds like also in the outside reference frame the object DOES pass the event horizon

Whether or not the object passes the horizon does not depend on any choice of reference frame. The outside observer's natural reference frame cannot describe the object passing the horizon. (Also note that this "natural" frame is not the only one the outside observer can adopt; he can choose others which can describe the object passing the horizon, even though he can't see light rays from it directly.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CrazyNinja

Similar threads

  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
6K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K