How is it possible to measure an IR LED source in mW/sr?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Valentin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infrared Ir
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of measuring the intensity of a collimated infrared light source in units of mW/sr. Participants explore the feasibility of converting measurements from mW/cm² to mW/sr, the necessary conditions for such conversions, and the availability of instruments capable of direct measurement in mW/sr.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to create an intensity map of an IR LED source but struggles to find equipment that measures in mW/sr, noting that most instruments measure in mW/cm².
  • Another participant suggests that conversion from mW/cm² to mW/sr requires knowledge of the distance from the source to the detector and that the sensor's diameter may also be a factor.
  • Concerns are raised about the assumptions involved in the conversion method, particularly regarding the size of the source relative to the distance and the filling of the detector.
  • Some participants discuss the potential for deriving a conversion number based on distance and the need to consider wavelength dependency when converting between photometric and radiometric units.
  • One participant mentions finding a device that claims to measure in mW/sr but expresses skepticism about its reliability.
  • There is a discussion about the differences between photometric and radiometric measurements, with one participant clarifying their intent to measure radiant intensity rather than using a lux meter.
  • Another participant notes that while radiant intensity of IR LEDs is specified in mW/sr in the industry, the actual measurement methods may differ from those used in data sheets.
  • Questions are raised about the implications of having a large or oddly shaped source on the definition of steradians and the measurement process.
  • One participant describes two projects involving IR sources with different beam characteristics and measurement requirements, indicating a need for specific measurement techniques for each.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of converting measurements and the availability of suitable instruments. No consensus is reached regarding the existence of a direct measurement device in mW/sr or the best approach to take for accurate measurements.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the size of the source, the distance to the detector, and the specific characteristics of the measuring instruments. The discussion also highlights the complexity of converting between different measurement units and the potential for discrepancies in reported data.

Valentin
Messages
9
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
How is it possible to measure an IR LED source in mW/sr?
Hello everyone,
I need to make measurements of a collimated infrared light source at different angles, practically to create an intensity map, all this in mW/sr.
I can't find any equipment able to measure in mW/sr, while there are plenty of instruments capable to measure in mW/cm^2.
As I understand, there is no conversion from mW/cm^2 to mW/sr.
Any solutions or advice?
 
Science news on Phys.org
To convert from mW/cm2 to mW/sr, you would have to know the distance from the source to the detector, your instrument probably doesn't know that. OTOH, I don't see why you can't do the conversion yourself.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
DaveE said:
To convert from mW/cm2 to mW/sr, you would have to know the distance from the source to the detector, your instrument probably doesn't know that. OTOH, I don't see why you can't do the conversion yourself.
This is not a problem, I can place the sensor at a known distance, say 1m.
I assume that also the sensor's diameter/surface is a factor?
 
This conversion method assumes the source is small compared to 1m and fills the detector. Try a few distances if you need to be sure.
 
hutchphd said:
This conversion method assumes the source is small compared to 1m and fills the detector. Try a few distances if you need to be sure.
The source is an IR lambertian LED, collimated to an oval beam of 20/40°. I need to measure the radiant intensity at several points/coordinates. Many sensors are 1cm diameter so I believe it fills the sensor's surface.
The question is if there is any instrument capable of measuring directly in mW/sr.
 
DaveE said:
Have you tried google search yet?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steradian
Never thought about it, thanks for the "illumination".
I asked a simple question, if anyone knows if there is any instrument capable to measure W/sr, I don't need a lecture about what a steradian is or ways to go around with conversions.

To explain my point, we have at work a goniophotometer we use to test automotive lamps.
It has sensors at 3.16, 10 and 25m capable to measure lux or cd.
I install the lamp in the machine and it runs the tests by moving to the correct coordinates and measuring the intensity at each point.
I am looking for something similar but in mW/sr, the automatic part is not necessary, only a meter capable to measure in these units. I simply find it hard to believe that such thing doesn't exists.
 
For each distance you can derive a single conversion number. This will contain conversion from an area to solid angle. It will, for your measurement, also need to convert from photometric to radiometric units (this is wavelength dependent).
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Gleb1964 and berkeman
Valentin said:
I don't need a lecture about what a steradian is or ways to go around with conversions.
Sorry, I didn't mean to be demeaning. I was just trying to help. This was in response to your question about whether the size of the detector mattered (which BTW, yes).

Valentin said:
I assume that also the sensor's diameter/surface is a factor?
So I assumed that you might not be familiar with how steradians are defined.

Good luck, I hope you find the instrument you seek. I don't know of anything like that. Most instruments give you the data they actually measure in what ever units make the most sense for the most users; that way they can sell more of them.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
  • #10
DaveE said:
Sorry, I didn't mean to be demeaning. I was just trying to help. This was in response to your question about whether the size of the detector mattered (which BTW, yes).So I assumed that you might not be familiar with how steradians are defined.

Good luck, I hope you find the instrument you seek. I don't know of anything like that. Most instruments give you the data they actually measure in what ever units make the most sense for the most users; that way they can sell more of them.
Everything is OK Dave, simply the discussion was going in another direction.
Meanwhile I found a Chinese device that according to what they claim is measuring in mW/sr and has a setting of the distance. God knows if it is reliable or not, too good to be true.
 
  • #11
hutchphd said:
For each distance you can derive a single conversion number. This will contain conversion from an area to solid angle. It will, for your measurement, also need to convert from photometric to radiometric units (this is wavelength dependent).
So if I take a sensor that measures in W/cm^2 with a surface of 1cm^2 placed it at 1m, I just multiply the measured value by 10,000 and that's it?
 
  • #12
You said your instrument measured lux as I recall. This is not a radiometric unit so I cannot be sure you understand photometry vs radiometry.
 
  • #13
hutchphd said:
You said your instrument measured lux as I recall. This is not a radiometric unit so I cannot be sure you understand photometry vs radiometry.
I was talking about a goniophotometer we use for other things and mentioned it as an example of the measurement PROCEDURE I am looking for. No, I have no intention to measure radiant intensity with a lux meter.
This is what I wrote in the only reply where I mentioned the word "lux"
Valentin said:
I am looking for something similar but in mW/sr, the automatic part is not necessary, only a meter capable to measure in these units.

Maybe my English is wrong or my explanations or.....
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
  • #14
DaveE said:
Most instruments give you the data they actually measure in what ever units make the most sense for the most users; that way they can sell more of them.
In the LED industry, the radiant intensity of IR LEDs is always specified in mW/sr. So I imagine that such equipment exists.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
  • #15
Valentin said:
In the LED industry, the radiant intensity of IR LEDs is always specified in mW/sr. So I imagine that such equipment exists.
I'm glad you found a suitable instrument.

How experimental data is acquired and how it is reported are often different things. Those data sheets could have been made with a conventional power meter; in fact I would guess that they were since, as you've seen, the unconventional meters are... well..., unconventional.
 
  • #16
hutchphd said:
This conversion method assumes the source is small
The units assume it as well. What is a steradian if you have a big, perhaps oddly shaped, source?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
  • #17
Vanadium 50 said:
The units assume it as well. What is a steradian if you have a big, perhaps oddly shaped, source?
This is a good question.
I am working on 2 projects, one is an IR illuminator with an oval beam 20/40° with radiant intensity up to 500mW/sr. The other project is an IR indicator with diffused beam and very low intensity, in the range of practically uW/sr.
I need to create for the first one an intensity map with a resolution of 1° vertically. I assume that I need to place the sensor at a distance where the sensor's diameter creates an angle of 1° from the source.
But what about the diffused one? This is supposed to be measured in an integrating sphere.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
15K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K