How Is Net Work Calculated on an Incline?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RanaiD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Net Work
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of net work when pushing a box up an incline. Participants explore the relationship between forces, displacement, and work, considering both horizontal and vertical components of movement. The conversation includes theoretical aspects of work and energy, as well as practical problem-solving approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether net work should be calculated by combining work done in both x and y directions or if it should be treated separately for each direction.
  • Another participant asserts that net work is typically the net force multiplied by the distance moved along the slope, suggesting a formula that includes gravitational work and kinetic energy changes.
  • There is a discussion about whether to include the work done by gravity in both horizontal and vertical displacements, with one participant advocating for the inclusion of vertical displacement work.
  • Participants emphasize the importance of defining "net work" and the context in which it is being calculated, noting that the dot product of force and displacement vectors is crucial for accurate calculations.
  • References to external discussions are made to clarify the concept of net work and its application in different scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how to calculate net work, particularly regarding the inclusion of vertical displacement and the interpretation of forces acting on the box. No consensus is reached on the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need to clarify definitions and contexts when discussing net work, as this can influence the calculations and interpretations of energy changes.

RanaiD
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm struggling with the concept of net work. If I had a box and was pushing it up an incline would the net work be all the forces parallel to displacement in x direction * displacement in the x direction added up, plus the displacement in the y direction * force gravity parallel to displacement in y direction. Or would I separate the net work based on whether displacement is in y and x direction.
In other words is net work the total work in both directions of displacement on an incline added up OR is the net work calculated separately for x direction and y direction displacement.

I ask this because I always thought that net work on an incline would be the work done in vertical direction displacement on incline as well as work done in horizontal direction, but when I solve problems that look for change in kinetic energy, change in k = net work and the only work included is in the direction of displacement.
I tried to reconcile this using 1/2mv1^2+mgh1=1/2mv2^2+mgh2
But I got:
1/2mv^2=mgh
Which is different from change in k=net work
1/2mv^2=Work in x direction

So I guess this more three questions than one.

Thank you for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Work is always done by something on something.

Net work done on something would usually be the net force on it multiplied by the distance it moves.

So net work for pushing an object up an incline would be the net force acting up the hill multiplied by the distance moved along the slope.
This would also be the change in total energy ... so the work done on the object would be: ##W = mg(y_2-y_1) + \frac{1}{2}m(v^2-u^2)## in the absence of friction.
With friction there is an extra term for whoever/whatever is doing the work against the friction. This will change the internal energy of the object so you have to decide if this should be included in the work done on the object. That will depend on the context.
That help?
 
So does that mean you only look at the work of the forces acting parallel to the x displacement of the box moving up the incline?
I understand why you would add the work done by gravity along the horizontal displacement, but why wouldn't you also add the vertical displacement done by gravity, mgcos(theta)*y displacement

Because when I calculate the net work on a problem with a box being pushed up an incline I always want to do:
Wgx + Wpush+Wfr+Wgy= net work
Where wgx is the work done by gravity to push the box horizontally along the incline
And wgy is the work done by gravity on box in its vertical displacement up the incline.

Thank you so much again for your help!
 
RanaiD said:
So does that mean you only look at the work of the forces acting parallel to the x displacement of the box moving up the incline?
Force F and displacement s are vectors ... by definition, the work is ##W=\vec F \cdot \vec s## ... that is,it is the dot product of the net force with the displacement.

I understand why you would add the work done by gravity along the horizontal displacement, but why wouldn't you also add the vertical displacement done by gravity, mgcos(theta)*y displacement
I did. But I think I didn't make myself clear - in my example formula using work = change in energy, I had implicitly defined the +y direction as "upwards", so ##\vec F_{grav}= -mg\hat\jmath##. When you consider that the displacement is ##\vec s = \Delta x \hat\imath + \Delta y\hat\jmath## you can see how the dot product comes out.
The trick is to work out where the energy comes from and where it goes so you can make sense of the signs.

Because when I calculate the net work on a problem with a box being pushed up an incline I always want to do:
Wgx + Wpush+Wfr+Wgy= net work
Where wgx is the work done by gravity to push the box horizontally along the incline
And wgy is the work done by gravity on box in its vertical displacement up the incline.

Thank you so much again for your help!
I think you need to take care to define what you mean by "net work" and what is doing it on what.
This can change depending on the context.

##W=\vec F_{net}\cdot\vec s## would be the work done by the net force ... the work done on the box by the net force would be the negative of this.

For collisions - the "net work" is the average force during the impact times the distance moved during the impact.

Some other discussions:
http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/189190/is-net-work-and-total-work-same

This one may be closer to your confusion:
http://physics.stackexchange.com/qu...en-we-lift-it-and-put-it-on-the-table-is-zero
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
383
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K