How Is Polar to Rectangular Conversion Used in Complex Number Calculations?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the conversion between polar and rectangular forms of complex numbers, specifically in the context of the expression 208L0 - 2.5L90 x 27.42L36.9, which is calculated to 255.12L-12.4. Users encountered difficulties in performing the calculations correctly, particularly in the subtraction and multiplication of complex numbers. Key insights include the clarification that multiplication is easier in polar form while addition and subtraction are more straightforward in rectangular form. The final correct result is confirmed as 255.12∠-12.41 after addressing arithmetic errors and proper application of signs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers in both polar and rectangular forms
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions (sine and cosine)
  • Basic arithmetic operations involving complex numbers
  • Knowledge of converting between polar and rectangular forms
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of complex numbers in polar and rectangular forms
  • Learn about the use of calculators for complex arithmetic, such as the HP50
  • Explore the application of trigonometric identities in complex number calculations
  • Investigate common pitfalls in arithmetic operations with complex numbers
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, engineering, or physics who are working with complex numbers and need to understand the conversion between polar and rectangular forms for calculations.

Dcmagni
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
I'm having trouble trying to calculate how the answer below was achieved from an example i have seen, see below:

208L0 - 2.5L90 x 27.42L36.9 which is then calculated to 255.12L-12.4.

I have tried converting everything to rectangular form, subtract where required and the convert back to polar form to multiply. To be honest I have tried every way and can not figure this out. Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Dcmagni said:
208L0 - 2.5L90 x 27.42L36.9 which is then calculated to 255.12L-12.4.
I'm having a hard time parsing what you wrote. Are your "L" characters supposed to be indicating angles? ( ∠ )

And is the "x" character meant to represent some kind of multiplication (cross product?)
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to PF.I'm having a hard time parsing what you wrote. Are your "L" characters supposed to be indicating angles? ( ∠ )

And is the "x" character meant to represent some kind of multiplication (cross product?)
Yes apologies, it would not let me enter the angle sign for some reason. Also the 'x' is multiplication
Thank you
 
Dcmagni said:
Yes apologies, it would not let me enter the angle sign for some reason. Also the 'x' is multiplication
Thank you
Are these complex numbers?
 
Dcmagni said:
I'm having trouble trying to calculate how the answer below was achieved from an example i have seen, see below:

208L0 - 2.5L90 x 27.42L36.9 which is then calculated to 255.12L-12.4.

I have tried converting everything to rectangular form, subtract where required and the convert back to polar form to multiply. To be honest I have tried every way and can not figure this out. Any help is appreciated.
If you want help, you must show all the steps of your calculations in detail. Using my HP50 calculator which can do complex arithmetic I get a result of 255.11795 < -12.408174
 
Dcmagni said:
I have tried converting everything to rectangular form, subtract where required and the convert back to polar form to multiply. To be honest I have tried every way and can not figure this out.
Can you show us some of your work so we can check it over for mistakes? You should be able to copy/paste the angle symbol that I posted to make the notation clearer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dcmagni
So far I have the understanding that subtraction is easier in polar form and multiplication in rectangular form, I need to transform into rectangular form.

I have first multiplied 2.5∠90 x 27.42∠36.9.
= 68.55∠126.9 (I have multiplied the polar magnitude and addition for the angle)

Then I have converted 208∠0 - 68.55∠126.9 into rectangular form.
208∠0 =
(208)(cos0) = 208
(208)(sin0) = 0
Therefore = 208+j0

-68.55∠126.9 =
(68.55)(cos126.9) = -41.16.
(68.55)(sin126.9) = j54.82
Therefore = -41.16+j54.82

Resulting in 208+j0 - 41.16+j54.82.
Subtracting to me gives a result of: 166.84 - j54.82 (Subtracting the magnitudes and the angles)

I have then converted 166.84 - j54.82 back to polar form.

Magnitude = √166.84^2 - 54.82^2
= 157.57
Angle = arctan -54.82/166.84
= -18.19

Therefore my final result is 157.57∠-18.19. Which is not the same as the result from the example that was given.
 
Dcmagni said:
Therefore = -41.16+j54.82

Resulting in 208+j0 - 41.16+j54.82.
Subtracting to me gives a result of: 166.84 - j54.82 (Subtracting the magnitudes and the angles)
You've added these two complex numbers. Whereas, you were supposed to subtract one:

Dcmagni said:
208L0 - 2.5L90 x 27.42L36.9 which is then calculated to 255.12L-12.4.
 
PeroK said:
You've added these two complex numbers. Whereas, you were supposed to subtract one:
Sorry I don't understand what you mean, where have I added?

I have subtracted as follows:
208 - 41.16 = 166.84
j0 - j54.82 = -j54.82.
Therefore resulting in 166.84 - j54.82
 
  • #10
Dcmagni said:
Sorry I don't understand what you mean, where have I added?

I have subtracted as follows:
208 - 41.16 = 166.84
j0 - j54.82 = -j54.82.
Therefore resulting in 166.84 - j54.82
What's ##208 - x## when ##x = -41##?
 
  • #11
PeroK said:
What's ##208 - x## when ##x = -41##?
249? If so then this answer is still incorrect as the answer gives 255.12
 
  • #12
Dcmagni said:
249? If so then this answer is still incorrect as the answer gives 255.12
That's just the real part.
 
  • #13
Dcmagni said:
So far I have the understanding that subtraction is easier in polar form and multiplication in rectangular form, I need to transform into rectangular form.

I have first multiplied 2.5∠90 x 27.42∠36.9.
= 68.55∠126.9 (I have multiplied the polar magnitude and addition for the angle)

Then I have converted 208∠0 - 68.55∠126.9 into rectangular form.
208∠0 =
(208)(cos0) = 208
(208)(sin0) = 0
Therefore = 208+j0

-68.55∠126.9 =
(68.55)(cos126.9) = -41.16.
(68.55)(sin126.9) = j54.82
Therefore = -41.16+j54.82

Resulting in 208+j0 - 41.16+j54.82.
Subtracting to me gives a result of: 166.84 - j54.82 (Subtracting the magnitudes and the angles)

I have then converted 166.84 - j54.82 back to polar form.

Magnitude = √166.84^2 - 54.82^2
= 157.57
Angle = arctan -54.82/166.84
= -18.19

Therefore my final result is 157.57∠-18.19. Which is not the same as the result from the example that was given.
When you did this:

"-68.55∠126.9 =
(68.55)(cos126.9) = -41.16.
(68.55)(sin126.9) = j54.82
Therefore = -41.16+j54.82"

You forgot to apply the leading minus sign which was at the very beginning.
The correct result is: +41.16-j54.82

You need to include parentheses where appropriate. Next you can either subtract (-41.16+j54.82), or you can add (+41.16-j54.82), which would give:

"Resulting in 208+j0 -(-41.16+j54.82).
Subtracting to me gives a result of: 249.16 - j54.82 (Subtracting the magnitudes and the angles)"

You are not subtracting magnitudes and angles. You are subtracting real parts and imaginary parts.

Converting to polar gives: 255.12 ∠-12.41
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #14
Note that if ##z = z_1 - z_2z_3##, then:
$$|z|^2 = r_1^2 + r_2^2r_3^2 - 2r_1r_2r_3\cos(\theta_1 - \theta_2 - \theta_3)$$
 
  • #15
The Electrician said:
When you did this:

"-68.55∠126.9 =
(68.55)(cos126.9) = -41.16.
(68.55)(sin126.9) = j54.82
Therefore = -41.16+j54.82"

You forgot to apply the leading minus sign which was at the very beginning.
The correct result is: +41.16-j54.82

You need to include parentheses where appropriate. Next you can either subtract (-41.16+j54.82), or you can add (+41.16-j54.82), which would give:

"Resulting in 208+j0 -(-41.16+j54.82).
Subtracting to me gives a result of: 249.16 - j54.82 (Subtracting the magnitudes and the angles)"

You are not subtracting magnitudes and angles. You are subtracting real parts and imaginary parts.

Converting to polar gives: 255.12 ∠-12.41
Ok thank you for your reply and feedback.

So the process I am using is correct which is a good start. Looking at what you have put and inputting the correct figures I have gotten.

208 + j0 + 41.16 - j54.82 gives 241.16 - j54.82 (As you have suggested above)

Converting to polar:
√241.16^2 + (-54.82^2)
= √58158.15 + (-3005.23)
= √55152.92
=234.85

arctan 54.82/241.16 = -12.81

= 234.85 ∠ -12.81

I just do not understand where I am going wrong.
 
  • #16
Dcmagni said:
I just do not understand where I am going wrong.
Negative numbers square to positive numbers!
 
  • #17
Dcmagni said:
I just do not understand where I am going wrong.
Alternatively, with ##z = a+bj##, we have:
$$|z|^2 = a^2 + b^2 \ne a^2 - b^2$$
 
  • #18
PeroK said:
Negative numbers square to positive numbers!
Even still.

Converting to polar:
√241.16^2 + (-54.82^2)
= √58158.15 + (+3005.23)
= √61163.38
=247.31

arctan 54.82/247.31 = -12.49

= 247.31 ∠ -12.49

I have just tried this after reading another article but it still doesn't seem to come up with the right answer.
 
  • #19
Dcmagni said:
Even still.

Converting to polar:
√241.16^2 + (-54.82^2)
= √58158.15 + (+3005.23)
= √61163.38
=247.31

arctan 54.82/247.31 = -12.49

= 247.31 ∠ -12.49

I have just tried this after reading another article but it still doesn't seem to come up with the right answer.
You're just making basic mistakes like typing ##241## instead of ##249##.

Why not put the calculation on a spreadsheet?
 
  • #20
r_1theta_1r_2theta_2r_3theta_3xyrtheta
208​
0​
2.5​
1.570796​
27.42​
0.644026​
249.1588​
-54.8184​
255.1179​
-12.4082​
 
  • #21
You are right and thank you for all your help. Heads jammed juggling this and work at the same time. Again, appreciate your help.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #22
Dcmagni said:
Ok thank you for your reply and feedback.

So the process I am using is correct which is a good start. Looking at what you have put and inputting the correct figures I have gotten.

208 + j0 + 41.16 - j54.82 gives 241.16 - j54.82 (As you have suggested above)

Converting to polar:
√241.16^2 + (-54.82^2)
= √58158.15 + (-3005.23)
= √55152.92
=234.85

arctan 54.82/241.16 = -12.81

= 234.85 ∠ -12.81

I just do not understand where I am going wrong.
You have a simple arithmetic error. Are you doing your arithmetic by hand? Don't you have a calculator or a calculator app for your phone?

You have:
"208 + j0 + 41.16 - j54.82 gives 241.16 - j54.82 (As you have suggested above)"

but it should be:

"208 + j0 + 41.16 - j54.82 gives 249.16 - j54.82 (As you have suggested above)"

Edit: Sorry, I just noticed that PeroK already pointed this out.
 
  • #23
Dcmagni said:
So far I have the understanding that subtraction is easier in polar form and multiplication in rectangular form, I need to transform into rectangular form.

I can see that the original question has already been addressed. Here I would like to comment on the statement mentioned in the above quote. I think, as demonstrated below, it should be,

The multiplication of two complex numbers is easier in polar form and addition/subtraction of two complex numbers is easier in rectangular form.​

Let’s first represent a complex number in polar form with (r, θ). We have

z2 = (2.5, 90)​
z3 = (27.42, 36.9)​
z2×z3 = (2.5*27.42, 90+36.9) = (68.55, 126.9)​
[See Eq. (3.11) of Complex variables.]​

Let’s next represent a complex number in rectangular form with (x, yi), where i = sqrt(-1).
Then

z1 = (208, 0i)​
z2×z3 = [68.55*cos(126.9), 68.55*sin(126.9) i] = (-41.16, 54.82i)​
z1 - z2×z3 = (208+41.16, 0i-54.82i) = (249.16, -54.82i)​

Convert it into polar form we have:

z1 - z2×z3 = (255.12, -12.41)​
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
13K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
849
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K