How is Single Photon Polarization Determined in Free Space?

psycherevolt
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I was wondering how exactly a single photon is polarized. In the case of an electromagnetic wave in theoretical free space Maxwell's equations state that electric and magnetic fields must be equal in amplitude and in phase with each other. On wikipedia's "photon polarization" article it states that single photons are completely polarized. Does this mean that the polarization of single photons oscillate around a complex plane changing the linear polarization between 180 degree states perpendicular to the path of travel?

Also, in (non-theoretical) free space the index of refraction is very very close to 1, does any deviance allow for circular or elliptical polarization?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Light waves from most sources are unpolarized. Light photons from most sources are unpolarized, meaning that although each photon is polarized (meaning its electric vector is along a certain direction), the assemblage of photons have a random transverse orientation. Exceptions are:blue sky light at 90 degrees to the sun on a very clear day, Brewster's angle reflected light from a lake, glossy painted surface etc.

The ratio of E to H in the MKS system (volts per meter, amp-turns per meter) is 377 ohms in vacuum. E and H are orthogonal to each other and to the direction of propagation.
 
You didn't answer my question. I'm asking if the linear polarization state of a single photon oscillates 180 degrees due to the coupling of electromagnetic waves in free space. Say you had linearly polarized light on the y-axis propagting on the z-axis. Does a single photon oscillate so that its polarization varies between + and - y directions?
 
See sections 1.2.2 and 4.1.3.2 on circular polarization of single photons
http://wapedia.mobi/en/Photon_polarization
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top