How Is Spin-Orbit Coupling Derived from the Dirac Equation?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
amjad-sh
Messages
240
Reaction score
13
I have read in the internet that "One naturally derive the dirac equation when starting from the relativistic expression of kinetic energy:

##\mathbf H^2=c^2\mathbf P^2 +m^2c^4## where ##\mathbf P## is the canonical momentum.
Inclusion of electric and magnetic potentials ##\phi## and ##A## by substituting ##\mathbf P -εA##in ##\mathbf P## and ##\mathbf H -ε\phi## in ##\mathbf H## we get ##(\mathbf H -ε\phi)^2=(c\mathbf P -εA)^2+m^2c^4##

1-My first question is: Why potential and electric potentials are included in that way, I mean ##\mathbf P -εA##in ##\mathbf P## and ##\mathbf H -ε\phi## in ##\mathbf H##?

Then the text I am reading continued to the part where he stated the dirac equation which is:

##(\mathbf H-c\sum_{\mu}p_{\mu}-\beta mc^2)\psi=0##

Now with the fact that## [\mathbf H -ε\phi -cα.(\mathbf p -ε/c\mathbf A) -\beta mc^2][\mathbf H -ε\phi +cα.(\mathbf p -ε/c\mathbf A) +\beta mc^2]\psi=0##

Using the approximation that the kinetic and the potential energies are small compared to mc^2, two components of the spin function can be neglected and the equation above take the form :

##[1/2m(\mathbf p -ε/c\mathbf A)^2 +ε\phi -(ε\hbar/2mc)\sigma \cdot \mathbf B -(ε\hbar/4m^2c^2)\mathbf E \cdot \mathbf p -(ε\hbar/4m^2c^2)σ \cdot (\mathbf E \times \mathbf p)]\psi=W\psi##
Where W +mc^2 is the total energy.

2-My second question is how we can reach the second formula, If somebody can give me some hints?
 
on Phys.org
I downloaded this chapter.It is in the first page.
 

Attachments

It says "One naturally arrives at the Dirac equation when starting from the relativistic expression for the kinetic energy" . Hard to find an author, though.

Anyway, taking ##e\phi## and ##e\vec A## into account as shown is standard (naturally :smile:), see e.g here or here
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: amjad-sh
BvU said:
It says "One naturally arrives at the Dirac equation when starting from the relativistic expression for the kinetic energy" . Hard to find an author, though.

Anyway, taking ##e\phi## and ##e\vec A## into account as shown is standard (naturally :smile:), see e.g here or here

Thanks,this was helpful.
I got the answer of my first question, can you give me some hints to reach the last equation?
 
amjad-sh said:
I got the answer of my first question, can you give me some hints to reach the last equation?
Do you know what ##\alpha## and ##\beta## are? You are going to need that, along with the identity
$$
(\mathbf{\sigma} \cdot \mathbf{A})(\mathbf{\sigma} \cdot \mathbf{B}) = \mathbf{A} \cdot \mathbf{B} + i \mathbf{\sigma} \cdot (\mathbf{A} \times \mathbf{B})
$$

By the way, you can find much better derivations of the spin-orbit coupling than the document you posted. Check out instead one of
Sakurai and Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics
Bransden and Joachain, Physics of Atoms and Molecules
Friedrich, Theoretical Atomic Physics
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: amjad-sh and BvU