How is string theory related to MWI?

calvin
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Are other worlds in the MWI existing in adjacent branes?

If one could bend the rules as currently defined, and one wanted to journey to another world under the MWI idea, how would you accomplish it? Is this ever discussed? Would it require fabulous amounts of power? Creation of a worm hole?

One final question, what are the odds of manipulating the nature of matter by manipulating the complement of the strings or rates of their vibration within the particles contained in matter?

On a scale from 1 to 100 (1 being completely retarded and 100 being completely genius) what rating would you give someone who told you they were pursuing a way of changing matter by flooding it with high frequency sound waves?

Sorry in advance if these questions are lame. I have the unfortunate condition of being immensely curious at the same being totally uninformed. Working on that second bit though.

Calvin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
calvin said:
Are other worlds in the MWI existing in adjacent branes?
No. All the worlds exist in the same space.
calvin said:
and one wanted to journey to another world under the MWI idea
You cannot. If you could then MWI would make a different prediction than other interpretations - but it doesn't.
calvin said:
One final question, what are the odds of manipulating the nature of matter by manipulating the complement of the strings or rates of their vibration within the particles contained in matter?

On a scale from 1 to 100 (1 being completely retarded and 100 being completely genius) what rating would you give someone who told you they were pursuing a way of changing matter by flooding it with high frequency sound waves?
The odds are 100% that this is just a science fiction collection of buzzwords.
 
calvin said:
Are other worlds in the MWI existing in adjacent branes?
No. Branes live in a 9 or 10 dimensional space (not counting time as a dimension). MWI worlds live in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space.
 
calvin said:
On a scale from 1 to 100 (1 being completely retarded and 100 being completely genius) what rating would you give someone who told you they were pursuing a way of changing matter by flooding it with high frequency sound waves?

Is this something you are contemplating, Calvin, or something someone else has claimed? Certainly, sound waves can damage us - 19 Hz is the resonant frequency of the human eyeball and very loud noise at around 5 Hz can make your breathing erratic and shake your bones. At the gruesome end of things, apparently your head would explode at 240 dB, which may not be changing matter, but it definitely does matter to the person who's head it is.

But if you're expecting to turn lead into gold, or some such fancy where objects change their constitution with ultrasound, then you are out of luck. It's a #1 on your scale.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top