How Is the Distance to the Seabed Calculated Using Sonar?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jess_18033152
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The distance to the seabed is calculated using sonar by measuring the time it takes for a sound pulse to travel to the seabed and back. The sound travels at a speed of 1480 m/s, and if the pulse is received 0.461 seconds after transmission, the total distance traveled is 682.28 meters. However, since this distance includes the return trip, the actual depth to the seabed is half of that, resulting in 341 meters. Understanding this calculation emphasizes the importance of recognizing that the time measured accounts for both the outgoing and returning journey of the sound pulse. Thus, the depth is determined by halving the total distance traveled.
Jess_18033152
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A depth sounder on a ship measures the distance between the bottom of the ship and the seabed using a high-frequency pulse of sound (sonar stands for SOund Navigation And Ranging). Sound travels through water at 1.48 km/s.

Calculate the distance to the seabed if the reflected pulse is received 0.461 s after the sound is transmitted. Assume that the ship is not moving and that the transmitter and receiver are located at the same position on the boat. Also assume that the seabed is flat, so that the first reflection is received from the surface directly beneath the boat.

Homework Equations


d = vt

v = 1480 m/s
t = 0.461 s

The Attempt at a Solution


d = v t
= 1480 x 0.461
= 682.28 m

Is this the correct equation to use for this question, if not what equation should I use?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jess_18033152 said:
d = v t
= 1480 x 0.461
= 682.28 m
This is the total distance traveled by the pulse. Is this the same thing as the depth?
 
Orodruin said:
This is the total distance traveled by the pulse. Is this the same thing as the depth?

The answer was using: 1480 x (1/2 x 0.461) = 341 m
 
That does not really answer the question if the total distance traveled is the same thing as the depth. The real question is not if you know what the answer is. The real question is whether or not you understand why the answer is what it is. What is the difference between your attempt and the answer? Why is it different?
 
Orodruin said:
That does not really answer the question if the total distance traveled is the same thing as the depth. The real question is not if you know what the answer is. The real question is whether or not you understand why the answer is what it is. What is the difference between your attempt and the answer? Why is it different?

Yes, it's half the time because we are only want the time to get to the sea bed, whereas we were given the time to reach the seabed and come back to the boat.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K