How is the effective Lagrangian for the Graviton coupling to matter derived?

Karatechop250
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
Could someone point to me where they derive the follow effective Lagrangian for the Graviton coupling to matter

L = \frac{1}{M_{pl{}}}h^{\mu \nu}T_{\mu \nu}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A great many books discuss the coupling of gravity to matter in the framework of the classical weak field approximation. One ref that does it QM-ically is Quantum Field Theory by Zee, Sect VIII, "Gravity and Beyond".

The fundamental definition Tμν = - (2/√-g) δSM/δgμν tells us that coupling of the graviton to matter (in the weak field limit) can be included by adding the term - ∫d4x ½hμν Tμν to the action...
 
Thanks, however this just seems as circular logic to me and confuses me cause we defined the stress energy tensor that way. I will read this book though.
 
Last edited:
Since physics is an experimental science, ultimately the answer is "so that our calculations match what we see". This may sound circular, but it's how (and why) science works.
 
It's not circular logic, it's just two ways of writing the same thing. Do you want to say T = δS/δg, or do you want to say δS = T δg?

More explicitly, the first form is Tμν = (2/√-g) δSM/δgμν

while the second form is δSM = ½∫d4x √-g Tμν δgμν

They both say that when you subject gμν to an infinitesimal variation, the change in the action is linear in δgμν, and the coefficient is defined to be Tμν.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top