How Is Work Calculated on a Mass on a Frictionless Track?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The work done on a 3.0 kg body on a frictionless horizontal air track by a constant horizontal force over 2.0 seconds is calculated to be 0.96 J. The initial velocity (vi) is 0 m/s, and the final position (xf) is 0.8 m. The correct approach involves recognizing that the acceleration is constant due to the constant force, leading to the use of kinematic equations to derive the final velocity and subsequently the force and work done. The initial miscalculation of work as 0.48 J was corrected by properly applying the kinematic equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law (F = ma)
  • Familiarity with kinematic equations for uniformly accelerated motion
  • Basic knowledge of work-energy principle (W = Fd)
  • Concept of constant acceleration in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review kinematic equations for uniformly accelerated motion
  • Study the work-energy theorem in detail
  • Learn about the implications of constant force on acceleration
  • Explore examples of work done in various physical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of work and energy concepts in action.

lemonpie
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 3.0 kg body is at rest on a frictionless horizontal air track when a constant horizontal force acting in the positive direction of an x-axis along the track is applied to the body. A stroboscopic graph of the position of the body as it slides to the right is shown in Figure 7-26. The force is applied to the body at t = 0, and the graph records the position of the body at 0.50 s intervals. How much work is done on the body by the applied force between t = 0 and t = 2.0 s?
http://www.lowellphysics.org/beta/Textbook%20Resources/Chapter%207.%20Kinetic%20Energy%20and%20Work/Problems/c07x7_11.xform_files/nw0308-n.gif

Homework Equations


um... v = x/t, a = v/t, F = ma, W = Fd?

The Attempt at a Solution


delta v = x/t = 0.8/2 = 0.4 m/s
delta a = v/t = 0.4/2 = 0.2 m/s^2
F = ma = 3*0.2 = 0.6 N
W = Fd = 0.6*0.8 = 0.48 J

This is not the correct answer. The correct answer is 0.96 J, twice my answer. What am I doing wrong? Please help me. This is not an assigned problem for points; it's just to help me understand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know that the force is constant. What does that tell you about acceleration? Once you figure that out, then determine which of the other kinematical variables that you know, and which ones you do not know, from the list: ti, tf, xi, xf, vi, vf. From this, and what you determine about the acceleration, you should be able to pick the appropriate kinematical equation.
 
turin said:
You know that the force is constant. What does that tell you about acceleration?
I think it tells me... that the acceleration is also constant. Should it tell me something else?

As for the variables:
ti = 0 s
tf = 2 s
xi = 0 m
xf = 0.8 m
vi = ?
vf = ?

I suppose if the acceleration is constant... then I can use those formulas in the beginning of the book... but I don't feel like that helps me, because all of those formulas seem to require vi or a, neither of which I have. Oh wait, vi = 0. So in that case...

vi = 0 m/s

xf - xi = 1/2(vi + v)t
0.8 = 1/2(2)v
v = 0.8 m/s

Then

v = vi + at
0.8 = 2a
a = 0.4 m/s^2

Then

F = ma
F = 3(0.4) = 12 N

Then

W = Fd
W = 12(0.8) = 0.96 J

Awesome! Thanks! I wonder why I couldn't just use the v = x/t... oh well. Thanks again!
 
lemonpie said:
I wonder why I couldn't just use the v = x/t...
Because v is not constant. That equation is only valid for constant (or average) speed.

BTW, there may have been a more direct approach (i.e. single kinematical equation), but I don't know what is in your book. Anyway, it just takes a while to get the hang of when to use which formula.
 
turin said:
Because v is not constant. That equation is only valid for constant (or average) speed.
Oh, right.

I'm sure there was a more efficient way to solve this problem, but I guess the thing for now was just for me to be able to solve it! TQ
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
12K
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K