How Long Does a 2.02 kW Heater Take to Match the Heat from Solar-Heated Water?

AI Thread Summary
To determine how long a 2.02 kW heater would take to match the heat from 859 kg of solar-heated water cooling from 11.3 to 0 °C and freezing, the total heat (Q) required is calculated as 328,406,952 J. The heater's power output is 2.02 kW, equivalent to 2020 J/sec. Dividing the total heat by the heater's output gives the time required: 328,406,952 J / 2020 J/sec, resulting in approximately 162,000 seconds or about 45 hours. The initial calculation mistakenly used a 1 kW heater instead of the correct 2.02 kW. The correct operation time for the 2.02 kW heater is significantly less than the initially calculated 91 hours.
rlc
Messages
128
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


To help keep his barn warm on cold days, a farmer stores 859 kg of solar-heated water (Lf = 3.35E+5 J/kg) in barrels. For how many hours would a 2.02 kW electric space heater have to operate to provide the same amount of heat as the water does, when it cools from 11.3 to 0 °C and completely freezes?

Homework Equations


Q=mc(deltaTdegC)+mL

The Attempt at a Solution


Q=(859)(4187)(11.3)+(859)(335000)
Q=328406952 J
1kW=1000W=1000J/sec
1000t=328406952 J
t=328406 secs*1min/60secs*1hour/60mins=91 hours

But this is wrong. What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have calculated for a 1000w heater.
 
You're correct that 1 kW = 1000 J/sec. But the heater is a 2.02 kW heater, not a 1 kW heater.

[Edit: like NascentOxygen said.]
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top