How Long to Boil Water with Two Thermophores?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two identical thermophores and their ability to boil one liter of water when connected in series and parallel circuits. The original poster states that one thermophore can boil the water in 600 seconds and seeks to determine the time required with two thermophores under different configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of connecting thermophores in series versus parallel, questioning how current and voltage are distributed in each case. There is exploration of the relationship between power, resistance, and time required to boil water.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the series and parallel configurations are being explored. Some participants express doubt about the validity of initial calculations, while others provide insights into the behavior of identical thermophores under different circuit conditions. Guidance has been offered regarding the voltage distribution in series connections.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the effects of identical resistance and voltage on current flow in both series and parallel circuits. There is an ongoing discussion about the assumptions made regarding power and energy calculations, as well as the intuitive understanding of the results.

ChessEnthusiast
Messages
115
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


We are given two identical thermophores. It is known that one of them can boil a liter of water in t = 600 s.
How much time would it take to boil one liter of water if we used two of these thermophores, connected
a) in a series circuit
b) in a parallel circuit
Voltage: 230 V

t = 600 s
U = 230 V
I1 = I2

Homework Equations



W - energy required to boil water

W = UIt

The Attempt at a Solution


a) series circuit

Since the thermophores are in a series, each of them will share the same current, thus:
W = (UI+UI)t = 2UIt => t = 300 s

b) parallel circuit

The thermophores are in a parallel connection, which means that they will share the current, and so each of them will be empowered with the current 0.5I

W = 0.5I U t + 0.5 I u T = UIt => t = 600 s

However, I doubt that this solution is valid.
Could you, please, give me some tips or reference how to tackle this problem?
Thank you very much in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ChessEnthusiast said:

The Attempt at a Solution


a) series circuit

Since the thermophores are in a series, each of them will share the same current
Yes, each thermophore in the series circuit will have the same current. But will that current be the same amount of current as when there was only one thermophore in the circuit?

Likewise in the parallel circuit you will need to consider whether or not each thermophore in the parallel circuit has the same current as in the original circuit with just one thermophore.
 
TSny said:
But will that current be the same amount of current as when there was only one thermophore in the circuit?

These thermophores are identical, and so they have identical resistance, and so if voltage is the same, then the current will also be the same,
right?
 
ChessEnthusiast said:
These thermophores are identical, and so they have identical resistance, and so if voltage is the same, then the current will also be the same,
right?
When the two devices are in series, does each device have a potential difference of 230 V?
 
Hmm..
U1 + U2 = 230 V

U1 = U2

Because the two thermophores are identical, and the Voltage needs to add up
Is that correct?
If so, that would mean that in the series circuit, the Voltage will be
U = 115 V
 
ChessEnthusiast said:
Hmm..
U1 + U2 = 230 V

U1 = U2

Because the two thermophores are identical, and the Voltage needs to add up
Is that correct?
If so, that would mean that in the series circuit, the Voltage will be
U = 115 V
Yes, good. In the series circuit the potential difference across each thermophore will be 115 V.

(Another approach to the problem, which you can use to check your result for the total power, is to replace the two resistances in series by one equivalent resistance and deduce the power for the equivalent resistance.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ChessEnthusiast
But now, I am getting a very unintuitive answer.

Since Useries = 0.5U
and
W = (U^2 / R) t

Substitute:

W = Useries2 tseries / R

W = (U^2 / 4R) t

t series= 4WR / U^2 = 4 t

Is it possible that time required by these two thermophores is FOUR times bigger than that required by only one?
 
ChessEnthusiast said:
But now, I am getting a very unintuitive answer.

Since Useries = 0.5U
and
W = (U^2 / R) t

Substitute:

W = Useries2 tseries / R

W = (U^2 / 4R) t
Is this the heat produced by just one of the thermophores in series or is it the total heat produced by both thermophores together?
 
  • #10
Ohh, right. It is the heat produced by only one thermophore.
The heat produced by both of them will be:
[tex]W = \frac{U^2}{2R} t[/tex]
And so
[tex]t_{series} = 2t[/tex]

Still, am I missing something?
 
  • #11
ChessEnthusiast said:
Ohh, right. It is the heat produced by only one thermophore.
The heat produced by both of them will be:
[tex]W = \frac{U^2}{2R} t[/tex]
And so
[tex]t_{series} = 2t[/tex]

Still, am I missing something?
That's the right answer for the series case. I don't think you're missing anything.
 
  • #12
TSny said:
That's the right answer for the series case. I don't think you're missing anything.

Well, I need to say that this answer is pretty unintuitive.
I would never say that two thermophores will require more time to boil water than only one.

That's the beauty of Physics:)
 
  • #13
ChessEnthusiast said:
Well, I need to say that this answer is pretty unintuitive.
I would never say that two thermophores will require more time to boil water than only one.

That's the beauty of Physics:)
Yes.

Now you can move to the parallel case. The answer you gave in the first post is incorrect.
 
  • #14
In the parralel case, the total current:
[tex]I = U(\frac{1}{R} + \frac{1}{R}) = \frac{2U}{R}[/tex]
Hence,
[tex]W = U I t = U^2 \frac{2}{R} t[/tex]

And finally
[tex]t_{parallel} = \frac{t}{2}[/tex]

I feel much better with this answer.
 
  • #15
Good work!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
3K