Chemistry How Many Moles of ATP Can Be Produced from One Mole of Glucose?

  • Thread starter Thread starter grumpyasian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moles
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the theoretical moles of ATP produced from one mole of glucose oxidation, which releases energy quantified by delta G. The delta G for ATP synthesis is +31.4 kJ/mol, while the delta G for glucose oxidation is -916 kJ/mol. This indicates that the energy released from glucose can theoretically produce a significant amount of ATP, but the exact calculation requires understanding the energy balance. Participants emphasize that the energy gained from glucose oxidation must not exceed the energy stored in ATP. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the importance of delta G in determining the efficiency of ATP production from glucose.
grumpyasian
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


assuming that all the energy released by the oxidation of one mole of glucose to carbon dioxide and water can be stored in the form of ATP, how many moles of ATP can be theoretically produced from ADP at 37 C? Use delta G since it tells you how much work a reaction could do or requires. ( P is a phosphate group, ADP is adenosine dephosphate, ATP is adenosine triphosphate)


Homework Equations


ADP ^-3 + H ^+ + P--> ATP ^-4 + H20 delta G= 31.4 KJ/mol


The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know how to start solving it, help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You will need delta G for glucose oxidation. Not knowing the circumstances it is hard to tell if you are expected to find it in tables or calculate from some other data.
 
delta G is -916 kj/mol for Glucose. i don't know where to start or how to...help?
 
Now it is a simple energy balance - amount of energy produced from glucose oxidation can't be higher than amount of energy stored in ATP.

--
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
7K
Back
Top