MHB How many possible 7-place license plates are there with 3 letters and 4 digits?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iamjokerface
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plate
Click For Summary
The problem involves calculating the total number of possible 7-place license plates consisting of 3 letters and 4 digits, with repetition allowed. The initial approach incorrectly used combinations for placing letters and digits, leading to confusion. A more accurate method involves selecting positions for the letters first, then filling the remaining spaces with digits, resulting in the expression 7 * 6 * 5 * 26^3 * 10^4. This accounts for the arrangement of letters and digits correctly. The final calculation should yield the correct total number of license plates.
iamjokerface
Hello,

I am stuck on this one problem. The problem asks:

How many different 7-place license plates are possible when 3 of the entries are letters and 4 are digits? Assume that repetition of letters and numbers is allowed and that there is no restriction on where the letters or numbers can be placed.

The way I approached the problem was:

There are 7C3 ways of choosing the places for letters, and in each letter place, there can be 26 choices. So 7C3*26*26*26 for the letters.
Then there are 7C4 ways of choosing the places for digits, and in each digit place, there are 10 choices, so 7C4*10*10*10*10.
To get the total possibilities, I multiplied the two.

I checked the answer but I am not getting the correct answer.

Where have I gone wrong?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think the problem is that letters are indistinguishable from one another, as are numbers. I would consider it more like this:

There 7 places to choose the first letter, 6 for the second, and 5 for the third. Once you've chosen the letter locations, the rest are all numbers. So I would probably have an expression like: $7\cdot 6\cdot 5\cdot 26^3 \cdot 10^4$. Does that work?
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K