How Many Sylow 2-Subgroups Are There in S4?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lmedin02
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the Sylow 2-subgroups of the permutation group S4, specifically addressing the application of Sylow's theorems in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of Sylow's first and third theorems, questioning the correct order of Sylow 2-subgroups and the nature of maximal p-subgroups.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on the definitions and properties of Sylow subgroups, while others express confusion regarding the order of the subgroups and the application of the theorems. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the order of S4 being 24 and the implications for the existence of Sylow subgroups, as well as a reference to the structure of the groups involved. The discussion also notes a misunderstanding regarding the definition of p-Sylow subgroups.

lmedin02
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I want to find the Sylow 2-subgroups of the permutation group S4

Homework Equations



I don't understand why is my application of Sylow's third theorem wrong.

The Attempt at a Solution



The order of S4 is 24=233. Thus, there are Sylow 2-subgroups and Sylow 3-subgroups by Sylow's first theorem. By Sylow's third theorem, the number of Sylow 2-subgroups is k=1 mod 2= 1,3,5,... and must divide the order of the group. Thus, k=1 or 3. But, each permutation (12), (13), (23), (14), (34) together with the identity permutation forms a subgroup of order 2 of S4. Thus, K should not be 3.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sylow's subgroups are maximal p-subgroups, not subgroups generated by an element of order p
 
Oh, ok. That's true. Sylow p-groups are maximal subgroups. Hence, in my problem my Sylow 2-subgroups are maximal, but they are subgroups of order 8. Thus, I should be looking for three Sylow 2-subgroups of order 8. Is this correct? Thank you for your guidance.
 
That's the statement of Sylows Theorem.

If the order of G equals n = p^k*m, p prime, then there exists a subgroup of order p^k, where k is the largest integer such that p^k divides the order of G.

You then know as well that there is an element of order 2, though.
 
I believe that you have misunderstood the definition of a p-Sylow subgroup, which in this case is not of order 2 but of order 8. The first theorem states that if p^m is the maximum power of p that divides |G| then there is a subgroup of order p^m and this is a p-Sylow subgroup. The 3rd theorem applies to this group, not the groups of order 2.

In fact there is a subgroup isomorphic to the Dsub4 (order 8), the group of symmetries of the square. In cyclic notation it is ----numbering the vertices in order clockwise (or the reverse) around the square --- {e, (1234), (13(24), (1432), (12)(34), (14)(32), (13), (24)}.

A few sample conjugations, say of (1234) by (123) shows that this is bot a normal subgroup. But all its conjugates (all 3 of them!) should contain the four-group as a subgroup, since all the elements with 2 2-cycles are present and the cycle structure is preserved.

BTW, Cauchy's Theorem predicts that a prime-power group like this has an element of order 2, ehich it certainly does. There is no statement of how many such groups there are, however.
 
Dude. This thread is 10 months old
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K