How many Watts do I need to heat this pipe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter steves1080
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heat Pipe Watts
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the required wattage to prevent freezing in a 4-inch diameter carbon steel pipe that is 1 foot long. The key equation provided for heat transfer is q = 2 π k (ti - to) / ln(ro / ri), where k is the thermal conductivity. Users noted discrepancies in calculations, particularly regarding the natural logarithm and area calculations, leading to an estimated wattage of around 22 kW for the heat loss. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate input values to achieve reliable results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of heat transfer principles
  • Familiarity with thermal conductivity measurements
  • Basic knowledge of logarithmic functions
  • Ability to perform unit conversions in thermal calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of carbon steel and its thermal conductivity
  • Learn about heat transfer calculations in cylindrical geometries
  • Explore insulation options for pipes to minimize heat loss
  • Investigate immersion heater specifications and wattage requirements
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, HVAC professionals, and anyone involved in thermal management of piping systems will benefit from this discussion, particularly those looking to prevent freezing in water pipes.

steves1080
Messages
64
Reaction score
1
Reference attached image.

In this simple system, I have a large reservoir of water that feeds a small section of 4" dia. pipe. There is about 1 ft of length until there is a gate valve to isolate the flow. When not flowing water, this 1-ft x 4-in section is at risk of freezing when temperatures are low enough. What I am looking to is basically add an immersion heater to prevent freezing, but I need to know how much power I need. Are there any quick heat transfer calc I can do to estimate this?

Thanks a ton-
 

Attachments

  • reservoir.jpg
    reservoir.jpg
    22.8 KB · Views: 564
Engineering news on Phys.org
It's carbon steel, so thermal conductivity is like 16 or so
 
Hi,

The following equation might help.

q = 2 π k (ti - to) / ln(ro / ri) (1)

where

q = heat transferred per unit time per unit length of cylinder or pipe (W/m, Btu/hr ft)

k = thermal conductivity of the material (W/m.K or W/m oC, Btu/(hr oF ft2/ft))

to = temperature outside pipe or cylinder (K or oC, oF)

ti = temperature inside pipe or cylinder (K or oC, oF)

ln = the natural logarithm

ro = cylinder or pipe outside radius (m, ft)

ri = cylinder or pipe inside radius(m, ft)

If you know what the coldest temperature that the water will be the temperature that you wish to keep the pipe at, you can find the heat transferred per length then multiply that by the length of your pipe (4ft). This will give you a watt value to heat the pipe.
 
Yea, I know I shouldn't be reinventing the wheel. But I'm very old fashioned and like to make sure I run my own numbers. The problem, acc0untnam3, with that approach (albeit the seemingly correct one), is that I am getting a massively high wattage of heat loss. Like WAY too high. But I am not seeing an issue with my numbers, so it must be the approach I am taking. See attached for my calculation. Any help would be extremely appreciated.
 

Attachments

steves1080 said:
Yea, I know I shouldn't be reinventing the wheel. But I'm very old fashioned and like to make sure I run my own numbers. The problem, acc0untnam3, with that approach (albeit the seemingly correct one), is that I am getting a massively high wattage of heat loss. Like WAY too high. But I am not seeing an issue with my numbers, so it must be the approach I am taking. See attached for my calculation. Any help would be extremely appreciated.

You forgot the natural logarithm..
ln(ro/ri) = 0.110311, you're using the thickness 0.005969 m...
The area is also wrong, you should calculate 2*PI()*L. Still Q is around 22kW.

I think Q is high because you have a 20ºC change in 5mm, and your thermal conductivity is quite high,,
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K