Biology How Many Ways Can an 8 Oar Boat Crew Be Selected from 11 People?

AI Thread Summary
To select an 8 oar boat crew from 11 people, with specific restrictions on which side individuals can row, the problem involves calculating combinations based on the distribution of rowers. There are 5 rowers who can only row on one side, 4 on the other, and 2 who can row on either side. The key is to ensure an equal number of rowers on both sides for balance. The discussion explores various configurations for selecting 4 rowers for each side while considering the limitations of the crew members. Ultimately, the solution requires careful calculation of combinations to meet the criteria for a balanced crew.
xiphoid
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A crew of an 8 oar boat has to be selected from 11 people, out of which 5 can oar only on one side, 4 can oar only on the other side and 2 can oar on either sides, find in how many ways can the selection be done?



The Attempt at a Solution



What I did here is assumed 3 possibilities
1. 7 on one side and 4 on the other---- assuming those two to be on one side
2. 6 on one side and 5 on the other---- equally dividing them on each side
3. 5 on one side and 6 on the other---- equally dividing them on each side
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In Oaring a boat, you have to man equal strength on either side or the boat will no go straight. Here, select 4 people for right side and 4 people for left side.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top